star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list
List archive
- From: Gerard Visser <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
- To: Xu Sun <sunxuhit AT gmail.com>, star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
- Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] <ADC> vs. TIme bin
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:26:28 -0400
hi Xu,
I think this is as we (or Zhenyu and I at least, I forget) have previously discussed, that it is related to timing of the ADC sampling on the waveform. This is a control parameter that needs to be tuned, especially now for FST which has a different cable/length than IST.
Do you have some software which can dump out the "digital header" of the APV data? There is a recipe from IST about the correct value of the first sample of first header bit, that we can use to set the timing parameter. I have to look at old notes and emails about how to do this. However, unfortunately the software which I had used to dump the data in a form that I could use for this tuning for IST, has been lost. So we first have to figure out how to see the full ASC waveforms, including the APV "digital header" and ideally the presamples before that too.
Gerard
On 4/27/2020 12:13 PM, Xu Sun wrote:
Hi Gerard,
We were trying to get better understanding about the signal feature we
got from FST module.
In the attached plot, you could find the <ADC> of noise vs. time bin
at 140V. It seems like the <ADC> of noise shows a certain pattern: the
noise in time bin 0 & 4 & 8 is significantly higher than the rest. We
don't quite understand what could be the reason to cause this kind of
oscillation behavior. Could you please give us some insight?
Best,
Xu
-
[Star-fst-l] <ADC> vs. TIme bin,
Xu Sun, 04/27/2020
- Re: [Star-fst-l] <ADC> vs. TIme bin, Gerard Visser, 04/27/2020
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.