Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fst-l - Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Position

star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: videbaek <videbaek AT bnl.gov>
  • To: Carl Gagliardi <c-gagliardi AT tamu.edu>
  • Cc: 'Star-fst L' <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, 'Hongwei Ke' <kehw AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Position
  • Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 08:30:57 -0500

No you are not,
I just thought that the majority of these would be normal top-bottom cosmic that will hit the cylinder,
-certainly the initial cuts should be loose as yuo say.

-F


On 2021-11-23 08:25, Carl Gagliardi wrote:
Hi Flemming—

I hadn’t imagined the HLT filter as the final answer. Rather, I had
imagined that it would select the small fraction of cosmic events that
project to the vicinity of the FST for a small data stream. Then that
stream can be run through Fast Offline to provide the TPC tracks,
followed by detailed FST-specific studies – multiplicities, timing,
amplitudes, hit correlations, etc.

Am I completely out to lunch?

Carl

From: videbaek <videbaek AT bnl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2021 6:34 AM
To: Hongwei Ke <kehw AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
Cc: Xu Sun <sunxuhit AT gmail.com>; Star-fst L
<star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>; Carl Gagliardi <c-gagliardi AT tamu.edu>;
Aschenauer Elke-Caroline <elke AT bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Position

Hi Hongwei, Thanks for implementing this. I think we could consider
strengthening th criteria. This woud allow any track that hits th
cycinder to be tagged. One suggestion would be to require one of two
conditions a) cylinder hit AND hit in ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart

This Message Is From an External Sender

This message came from outside your organization.

ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd

Hi Hongwei,

Thanks for implementing this.

I think we could consider strengthening th criteria. This woud allow
any

track that hits th cycinder to be tagged. One suggestion would be to

require

one of two conditions a) cylinder hit AND hit in second disk (182) or
b)

hit in disk 1 (148) and hit in disk(2). This would match the criteria

for the two trigger evpw/e and ewpdw.tof , and give higher probability


for also hits in stgc.

Of course the reduction is still large w/o this extra criteria.

F

On 2021-11-22 23:15, Hongwei Ke wrote:

Hi Fleming and all



Thank you for the info. Here is what I have implemented and ready
for

test.



* I use bField = 1e-6 Tesla instead of zero to make sure
all

extrapolation functions work properly. This value is chosen

arbitrarily. As long as it is not zero, the math should be correct.

* To "match FST", I extrapolate TPC tracks to three
surfaces.



* A cylinder: r = 36cm, 148 <= z <= 182cm # cylinder
geometry is

easier to deal with

* A disk r <= 36, z = 148

* A disk r <= 36, z = 182

* These values can be changed easily. If needed, they can
be

implemented as Run Control parameters that can be turned by shift
crew

run-by-run.



* The track extrapolation is done in sequence. If there is
one track

hits any of those three surfaces, it is a match and the event will
be

tagged.

* From my standalone test on a signal daq file from run
22326045,

748 out of 30374 events are tagged. The ratio is ~2.5%.



Best regards,

Hongwei Ke



On Nov 22, 2021, at 4:05 PM, videbaek <videbaek AT bnl.gov> wrote:



Hi Hongwei,

cc Xu



With the actual positions the z range should rather be 148 to 182,

As Xu says you can ether use a square for the xy cut or maybe
better

a circle with radius say 36(40)



F.



On 2021-11-22 15:59, Xu Sun wrote:

Hi Hongwei,

The radius of the FST disk is about 31cm, therefore, I quote 40cm

for

both x and y.

Not sure why Carl quotes y = 0, maybe Carl could comment.

Best,

Xu

On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 3:57 PM Hongwei Ke <kehw AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>

wrote:

Hi Xu,

Carl’s number in his Nov 20 email to star-ops are a little

different.

Would it be possible for L4 to identify those events with a cosmic

track that projects through the rectangle:

-40 < x < +40

140 < z < 180

At y=0

Which one should I use?

Best regards,

Hongwei Ke

On Nov 22, 2021, at 12:28 PM, Xu Sun <sunxuhit AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Hongwei,

As discussed in today's 10 clock meeting, please find the FST

position below:

x & y: -40 to 40 cm

z: 140 to 180 cm.

Hope this helps.

Best,

Xu

_______________________________________________

Star-fst-l mailing list

Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov


https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l__;!!KwNVnqRv!Tij1GWmARo0T_DKXPzcM1_Rw5YuPH00_5WA-UwwMR3Edp5294fCnpmXUm-UHYyLhAjE$
[1]



--

Flemming Videbaek

senior scientist

videbaek @ bnl.gov [1]

Brookhaven National Lab

Physics Department

Bldg 510D

Upton, NY 11973



phone: 631-344-4106

cell : 631-681-1596







Links:

------

[1]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://bnl.gov__;!!KwNVnqRv!Tij1GWmARo0T_DKXPzcM1_Rw5YuPH00_5WA-UwwMR3Edp5294fCnpmXUm-UHwoJbTxE$
[2]

--

Flemming Videbaek

senior scientist

videbaek @ bnl.gov

Brookhaven National Lab

Physics Department

Bldg 510D

Upton, NY 11973

phone: 631-344-4106

cell : 631-681-1596


Links:
------
[1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l__;!!KwNVnqRv!Tij1GWmARo0T_DKXPzcM1_Rw5YuPH00_5WA-UwwMR3Edp5294fCnpmXUm-UHYyLhAjE$
[2] https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/bnl.gov__;!!KwNVnqRv!Tij1GWmARo0T_DKXPzcM1_Rw5YuPH00_5WA-UwwMR3Edp5294fCnpmXUm-UHwoJbTxE$

--
Flemming Videbaek
senior scientist
videbaek @ bnl.gov
Brookhaven National Lab
Physics Department
Bldg 510D
Upton, NY 11973

phone: 631-344-4106
cell : 631-681-1596




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page