Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-fst-l - Re: [Star-fst-l] Final FST deadtime/rates with 3 timebins

star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Visser, Gerard" <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
  • To: "Ye, Zhenyu" <yezhenyu AT uic.edu>, Tonko Ljubicic <tonko AT bnl.gov>
  • Cc: Star-fst L <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] Final FST deadtime/rates with 3 timebins
  • Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:09:46 +0000

hi Zhenyu,
   The minimum deadtime will be 15% at 4.6 kHz, 21% at 6.5 kHz. It would be good to know if that will be acceptable, i.e. losing 21% of rare triggers maybe will be objected to?

      Gerard



From: Star-fst-l <star-fst-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Ye, Zhenyu <yezhenyu AT uic.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2021 10:05 AM
To: Tonko Ljubicic <tonko AT bnl.gov>
Cc: Star-fst L <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] Final FST deadtime/rates with 3 timebins
 
Hi Tonko and Gerard

Thanks for the effort to reduce the dead time.

As you have heard from the trigger board meeting, there is an interest to including forward trackers in mid-rapidity program.
>From what Tonko wrote, there seems to be large room for improvement on FST rate to go up from 4600 to 6500 Hz. If we could do that, it will provide an possibility to include FST in such triggers. I don’t know how much effort on your side is needed to do the code optimization and I would strongly encourage you to do that.

Thanks and Best,
Zhenyu

> On Dec 22, 2021, at 4:04 AM, Tonko Ljubicic <tonko AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hello Gerard, all,
>
> I played a bit with the intrinsic deadtime and:
>
> 1) 290 still crashes
> 2) 300 is OK -- I will set it to 300
>
> Running full blast I get 100% dead at:
>
> 1) 4600 Hz
> 2) 140 MB/s per fiber
> 3) 94% CPU usage
>
> Which means that at this point the CPU is the limiting factor.
> We'll see how it will go in reality, with actual required rates, etc
> but if we still have a problem I can mess with the code
> and likely optimize the CPU code more to reach the final
> limiter which is 200 MB/s per fiber, at ~6500 Hz.
>
>        -- Tonko
> _______________________________________________
> Star-fst-l mailing list
> Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-fst-l&amp;data=04%7C01%7Cyezhenyu%40uic.edu%7C1b0ab303f5db43f8619508d9c5327d09%7Ce202cd477a564baa99e3e3b71a7c77dd%7C0%7C0%7C637757642922188300%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=LvVJUpOx%2FwbCR9iuKJEqtmJuMrK4IBsycmbUqaXnDMs%3D&amp;reserved=0




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page