star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Star-fst-l mailing list
List archive
- From: "Aschenauer, Elke" <elke AT bnl.gov>
- To: Visser Gerard <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
- Cc: Star-fst L <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 19:11:00 +0000
I agree with Gerard, we need to know how many of the chips are going this and how many are not.
Cheers elke
On May 30, 2023, at 15:07, Visser, Gerard <gvisser AT indiana.edu> wrote:I guess the major question is, are these two exceptional chips or do they all do this?And the other question is, if people want to worry about this and investigate more, are we going to do some 5-tb (or more) running to see better what might be happening>GerardFrom: Ziyue Zhang <zzhan70 AT uic.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 1:39 PM
To: Visser, Gerard <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
Cc: Star-fst L <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted_______________________________________________Hello Gerard,Another example which is easy to track is RDO2_ARM1__PORT1_APV7. This one was also only touched yesterday.<image.png><image.png><image.png><image.png><image.png><image.png>Accident<image.png><image.png><image.png>New pedestal taken<image.png><image.png><image.png>etc... It got worse, by the time I decided to do something:<image.png>On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 11:33 AM Visser, Gerard <gvisser AT indiana.edu> wrote:hi Ziyue,Interesting. Is this a typical case, or is this APV exceptional?Really, if we have concerns -- I say perhaps we do -- we should run a bit with 5 timebins at least, see what that looks like. Also good to do this with fewer bunches filled, we have this opportunity, right?GerardFrom: Star-fst-l <star-fst-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Ziyue Zhang <zzhan70 AT uic.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2023 11:27 AM
To: Ye, Zhenyu <yezhenyu AT uic.edu>
Cc: Star-fst L <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency AdjustedI'm taking RDO3_ARM1_PORT1_APV7 as an example, and I'm choosing from the PHYS runs with close to 30 min run time.147003:<image.png>147004:<image.png>147005:<image.png>147008:<image.png>147015:<image.png>147016:<image.png>147021:<image.png>147024:<image.png>Accident happened after 147025.147066:<image.png>During this period of time, the LAT on this APV was not ever changed.On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 4:58 AM Ye, Zhenyu <yezhenyu AT uic.edu> wrote:No, I don’t expect APV timing shift due to that incident that the shifter forgot to turn off the FST_______________________________________________when the beam was terminated (I told Ziyue it is impossible). There could be other reasons likethese APVs were on the edge and so a small fluctuation led to different conclusion. It will begood to see how the MaxAdcTimebin plots for those APVs evolved over the last few days whenthe latency setting was changed.ZhenyuOn May 29, 2023, at 10:45 PM, videbaek <videbaek AT bnl.gov> wrote:Hi,
The APV chips are really much more radiation hardened as they were desing and used for LHC.
Too, I do not recall we ever have seen such shifts with APV chips for either IST or FST last year. I might be wrong,. Zhenyu can you confirm if we have seen such behavior ever before
best Flemming
On 2023-05-29 16:06, Visser, Gerard wrote:hi Ziyue,
It is also possible, of course, that the max timebin plot is just
generally unstable i.e. not that it moved in response to a particular
beam incident. That _might_ be the case, we should watch out for
the possibility. (If it is like that, probably adjustments each time
it changes is not the right approach, though I can't say for sure.)
* Gerard
-------------------------
From: Ziyue Zhang <zzhan70 AT uic.edu>
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2023 3:36 PM
To: Visser, Gerard <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
Cc: Star-fst L <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted
Hello Gerard,
Thank you for bringing up your concern. A minor clarification, I
should have used the word "accident"...
You are absolutely correct, I forgot the power cycle step; that will
be on my top list next time.
In the case of the current situation, this is my naive understanding:
since there was already a trip on every channel, and during the 1-2
days, the shift crews have turned on and off the FST multiple times,
so they should effectively have gone over power cycle... I checked the
Max Time Bin plots yesterday late afternoon, and noticed this issue,
but there was no beam, so I checked again this morning and made the
adjustment based on the plot in this morning's PHYS runs.
Sincerely,
Ziyue
On Mon, May 29, 2023, 12:11 Visser, Gerard <gvisser AT indiana.edu>
wrote:Dear Ziyue,Links:
Thanks, this sounds good. (I didn't look at plots right now,
sorry, but I trust you see the correct effects.)
However I am concerned by the statement " New APVs need
adjustment found, which is most likely caused by the "FST not off
during beam dump" incident yesterday":
* It should be basically impossible to have any lasting effect of
this sort from any beam incident. I'd expect if there is a lasting
effect, it would be in the nature of total failure or of an increase
in noise level.
* On the other hand though, the hardware _might at any time get
into a "upset" condition_, where some internal states are incorrect
and this might (not unlikely) be caused by beam conditions. It would
go back to normal upon a power cycling of everything.
* ==> If you think something shifted or is acting abnormally, power
cycle!
* If you readjusted something to make it normal instead, I suggest
power cycle and check things, and if necessary make adjustments
(maybe contrary to prior adjustments.
Sincerely,
Gerard
-------------------------
From: Star-fst-l <star-fst-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of
Ziyue Zhang <zzhan70 AT uic.edu>
Sent: Monday, May 29, 2023 11:40 AM
To: Star-fst L <star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted
Dear all,
The FST APV latency has been adjusted. Details can be found here
[1].
Best regards,
Ziyue
------
[1] https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fblog%2Fzyzhang%2FFST-Operation-Log-May-10-July-4-2023&data=05%7C01%7Cyezhenyu%40uic.edu%7C575988fd6ee0480f97f508db60859538%7Ce202cd477a564baa99e3e3b71a7c77dd%7C0%7C0%7C638209899096443526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=dWP1MonNRHxNXP66jK9M7pLozbRRyLFUFPhuksFSojY%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
Star-fst-l mailing list
Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-fst-l&data=05%7C01%7Cyezhenyu%40uic.edu%7C575988fd6ee0480f97f508db60859538%7Ce202cd477a564baa99e3e3b71a7c77dd%7C0%7C0%7C638209899096443526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=VnTRfxh52PkF6EnIpp19W%2B4K5L1TIgo%2FGkphHhqAUsQ%3D&reserved=0
--
Flemming Videbaek
senior scientist, emeritus
videbaek @ bnl.gov
Brookhaven National Lab
Physics Department
Bldg 510D
Upton, NY 11973
phone: 631-344-4106
cell : 631-681-1596
_______________________________________________
Star-fst-l mailing list
Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-fst-l&data=05%7C01%7Cyezhenyu%40uic.edu%7C575988fd6ee0480f97f508db60859538%7Ce202cd477a564baa99e3e3b71a7c77dd%7C0%7C0%7C638209899096443526%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=VnTRfxh52PkF6EnIpp19W%2B4K5L1TIgo%2FGkphHhqAUsQ%3D&reserved=0
Star-fst-l mailing list
Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-fst-l&data=05%7C01%7Czzhan70%40groute.uic.edu%7C5d2ab147ac234eb2cceb08db60ebf461%7Ce202cd477a564baa99e3e3b71a7c77dd%7C0%7C0%7C638210338786995520%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ahiA9sAF6MuMvD0BmlGDTWqykX8DTAjDOrWAXYzgWLM%3D&reserved=0
Star-fst-l mailing list
Star-fst-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-fst-l
Note: Please do not feel obligated to respond to this message outside of your work hours.
( `,_' )+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-
) `\ +
/ '. | Elke-Caroline Aschenauer (she/her/hers) =
| `, -
\,_ `-/ Brookhaven National Lab +
,&&&&&V Physics Dept., 25 Corona Road =
,&&&&&&&&: Bldg. 510 /2-195 Rocky Point, NY, -
,&&&&&&&&&&; 20 Pennsylvania Avenue 11778 +
| |&&&&&&&;\ Upton, NY 11973 =
| | :_) _ Tel.: 001-631-344-4769 Tel.: +1-631-569-4290 -
| | ;--' | Cell-USA: +1-757-2565224 +
'--' `-.--. | Cell-Europe: +49152220025211 =
\_ | |—‘ -
`-._\__/ Mail: elke AT bnl.gov elke.caroline AT me.com +
+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=-+=
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted
, (continued)
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
Visser, Gerard, 05/29/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
Ziyue Zhang, 05/29/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
Visser, Gerard, 05/29/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
videbaek, 05/29/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
Ye, Zhenyu, 05/30/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
Ziyue Zhang, 05/30/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Visser, Gerard, 05/30/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Visser, Gerard, 05/30/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Ziyue Zhang, 05/30/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Visser, Gerard, 05/30/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Aschenauer, Elke, 05/30/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Ziyue Zhang, 05/30/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Visser, Gerard, 05/30/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Ye, Zhenyu, 05/31/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Visser, Gerard, 05/31/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
Ziyue Zhang, 05/30/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
Ye, Zhenyu, 05/30/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
videbaek, 05/29/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
Visser, Gerard, 05/29/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
Ziyue Zhang, 05/29/2023
-
Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted,
Visser, Gerard, 05/29/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Ye, Zhenyu, 05/30/2023
- Re: [Star-fst-l] FST Latency Adjusted, Ziyue Zhang, 05/30/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.