star-fwd-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: FWD Software
List archive
Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Forward Track Fits Missing FTT points
- From: Akio Ogawa <akio AT bnl.gov>
- To: "Brandenburg, Daniel" <brandenburg.89 AT osu.edu>
- Cc: Borna Maghoul <bmagh001 AT ucr.edu>, "star-fwd-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-fwd-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Forward Track Fits Missing FTT points
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2025 17:18:53 -0400 (EDT)
Hello
Unless we have a short term solution for FTT and you plan to switch with FTT (for both MC and data) soon-ish, can we have separate Pico DST from Pythia MC with FTT added after FST seeding?
I don't know what pt (or zvertex) resolution to be expected from FST only tracking (in MC or ideal case for now). But it seems like we lost it and don't have any pt resolution nor charge separation.
If we go on without FTT for a while, we need to do something else, like including ECAL cluster in the track fit or something. Unless there is some code issue of some sort?
OGAWA, akio Email : akio AT bnl.gov
BrookHaven National Lab. Physics Dep. 510A 2-235
Upton, NY, 11973-5000 Tel. 631-344-5293
On Wed, 13 Aug 2025, "Brandenburg, Daniel" wrote:
Hi Kumar,
Apologies- I didn’t make it clear but until we have a plan for finishing the
FTT reconstruction and
including those points *in real data* I have disabled them in the track
fitting. This provides for the
time being, the most accurate and honest data to simulation comparison.
Best,
Daniel
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
From: star-fwd-software-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov
<star-fwd-software-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of
Borna Maghoul <star-fwd-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2025 11:24:05 PM
To: star-fwd-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-fwd-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Forward Track Fits Missing FTT points
Hi all, I've been playing around with the most recent commit of the
StFwdTrackMaker on some simulated
muon and pythia datasets and I've noticed that the reconstructed tracks only
use the FST and the vertex
for fits, and that another
Hi all,
I've been playing around with the most recent commit of the StFwdTrackMaker
on some simulated muon and
pythia datasets and I've noticed that the reconstructed tracks only use the
FST and the vertex for fits,
and that another fit using FTT hits aren't done. Based off of the debug, the
FTT hits are being loaded
in, as seen below:
image.png
I'm using the FST seeding. After the seed fitting with the FST points, no
further fits are done, so the
total number of fit points for the track is at most 4. Does anyone know why
this is occurring? It seems
that last month the tracker didn't seem to have this issue.
Regards,
Kumar
-
[[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Forward Track Fits Missing FTT points,
Borna Maghoul, 08/12/2025
-
Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Forward Track Fits Missing FTT points,
Brandenburg, Daniel, 08/13/2025
-
Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Forward Track Fits Missing FTT points,
Akio Ogawa, 08/14/2025
- Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Forward Track Fits Missing FTT points, Brandenburg, Daniel, 08/14/2025
-
Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Forward Track Fits Missing FTT points,
Akio Ogawa, 08/14/2025
-
Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Forward Track Fits Missing FTT points,
Brandenburg, Daniel, 08/13/2025
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.