star-fwd-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: FWD Software
List archive
- From: "Ogawa, Akio" <akio AT bnl.gov>
- To: "Van Buren, Gene" <gene AT bnl.gov>, "Brandenburg, Daniel" <star-fwd-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Pythia Jpsi sample
- Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2026 00:49:11 +0000
Hello
SigmaMax is nothing to do with tracking. It is FCS Ecal cluster width along its long axis. It is expected to be around 0.5 for (single) photon or electron/positron clusters, and larger for clusters containing 2 photons decayed from pi0 (how much larger depends
on energy).
SigmaMax is shown at middle right panel of
along with other variables I cut on, and in order I apply the cuts.
SigmaMax cut is the last FCS cut I apply before any tracking cuts. Thus title of histograms I sent in previous email says this is plot “after“cut on Sigma Max (thus after all FCS cuts).
BTW bottom left panel of above shows TrackPt/EcalET ratio in 1d histogram, and 2022 plot shows a nice peak at 1.
It is sort of explained at the top of mother page (
https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/akio/fcs/jpsi/ )but
I did send direct links the plots… Sorry.
And that reminded me that I did loosen the Pt/ET>0.3 cut to 0 and probably I should raise it back up to at least 0.1. Thanks.
Akio
From: Van Buren, Gene <gene AT bnl.gov>
Date: Friday, June 5, 2026 at 12:29 PM
To: Ogawa, Akio <akio AT bnl.gov>
Cc: Brandenburg, Daniel <star-fwd-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Pythia Jpsi sample
Date: Friday, June 5, 2026 at 12:29 PM
To: Ogawa, Akio <akio AT bnl.gov>
Cc: Brandenburg, Daniel <star-fwd-software-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Pythia Jpsi sample
Is smaller sigma max == worse resolution, or better resolution?
-Gene
> On Jun 5, 2026, at 12:12 PM, Ogawa, Akio <akio AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> One thing I failed to point out yesterday was momentum resolution. See Pythia Jpsi plots for ET(fcs) vs PT(track) at right bottom :
> 2022 : https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/akio/fcs/jpsi/dilep.cut4.JPsi.0.png
> 2026 : https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/akio/fcs/jpsi/20260603/dilep.cut4...1.png
> Compare to “2022” (not sure how FwdTrackig was working at that time… was it using some true info still?), it is much worse and almost no pT resolution now...
-Gene
> On Jun 5, 2026, at 12:12 PM, Ogawa, Akio <akio AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> One thing I failed to point out yesterday was momentum resolution. See Pythia Jpsi plots for ET(fcs) vs PT(track) at right bottom :
> 2022 : https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/akio/fcs/jpsi/dilep.cut4.JPsi.0.png
> 2026 : https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/spin/akio/fcs/jpsi/20260603/dilep.cut4...1.png
> Compare to “2022” (not sure how FwdTrackig was working at that time… was it using some true info still?), it is much worse and almost no pT resolution now...
-
[[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Pythia Jpsi sample,
Ogawa, Akio, 06/03/2026
- Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Pythia Jpsi sample, Brandenburg, Daniel, 06/04/2026
-
Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Pythia Jpsi sample,
Ogawa, Akio, 06/05/2026
-
Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Pythia Jpsi sample,
Van Buren, Gene, 06/05/2026
- Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Pythia Jpsi sample, Ogawa, Akio, 06/05/2026
-
Re: [[Star-fwd-software-l] ] Pythia Jpsi sample,
Van Buren, Gene, 06/05/2026
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.