star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-hf-l] STAR presentation by Qian Yang for SQM 2022 submitted for review
- From: tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: Heavy Flavor <star-hf-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, webmaster <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-hf-l] STAR presentation by Qian Yang for SQM 2022 submitted for review
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2022 09:24:54 +0800
Hi Barbara and Yu-Ming
Thanks for you suggestion.
I have a concern of combining two low-pT and high-pT together directly. As we are using two different method. Also, v2 results from TPC event-plane method would suffered from non-flow contribution. On slides 14, by looking at the Au+Au results with a similar <N_part>, the non-flow contribution is significant(0.16) at high-pT range.
At least we should mention low-pT and high-pT are using different method.
On slides 15, yes, It will be good to have the 0-80%, 4-10 GeV/c result.
Qian Yang
On 2022-05-31 22:47, Barbara Trzeciak via Star-hp-l wrote:
Hi Qian, Yu-Ming
thanks for the nice presentation Qian.
I have a question regarding the preliminary v2 results. I thought that
we should have one combined result on this, i.e. use MB data for low
pT and HT results at high pT ?
For the internal check it's good to see them overlaid and to compare
the statistical precision, but I think we should show one set of
points. I would suggest using the HT data from 4 GeV/c.
Yu-Ming, could you extract HT v2 for 20-60% centrality, but with the
current pT binning (not combined 3-10 GeV/c as on slide 15) ?
I also don't get the purpose of slide 15, why are there results for
different centrality ranges and with overlapping pT values ?
Thanks,
Barbara
On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 1:28 PM webmaster--- via Star-hf-l
<star-hf-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear star-hf-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,_______________________________________________
Qian Yang (qianyangstar AT gmail.com) has submitted a material for a
review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59787
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hf-l mailing list
Star-hf-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hf-l
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-hf-l] STAR presentation by Qian Yang for SQM 2022 submitted for review,
Barbara Trzeciak, 05/31/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-hf-l] STAR presentation by Qian Yang for SQM 2022 submitted for review,
Yu-Ming Liu, 05/31/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-hf-l] STAR presentation by Qian Yang for SQM 2022 submitted for review, Barbara Trzeciak, 05/31/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-hf-l] STAR presentation by Qian Yang for SQM 2022 submitted for review, tc88qy, 05/31/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-hf-l] STAR presentation by Qian Yang for SQM 2022 submitted for review,
Yu-Ming Liu, 05/31/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.