star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review
- From: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: Derek Anderson <derekwigwam9 AT tamu.edu>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review
- Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2022 10:35:08 +0530
Hello Derek,
Please find my comment and suggestions below on your nice presentation slides:
It is advised to follow the guidance for using roman vs. italic style of symbols.
https://iupac.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/ICTNS-On-the-use-of-italic-and-roman-fonts-for-symbols-in-scientific-text.pdf
Note: it should be written as $p$+$p$ and $p$+Au, etc, which is different from the guidance
Slide#1
I think you could change your title:
"Reconstruction of neutral-triggered recoil jets in
𝒔 = 𝟐𝟎𝟎 GeV 𝒑+𝒑 at the STAR experiment"
->
How about
"Measurement of semi-inclusive pi0+jet and gamma+jet in p+p collisions at
𝒔 = 𝟐𝟎𝟎 GeV and its impact on heavy-ion measurement in STAR"
Or similar to this
(Because your p+p analysis is important for drawing conclusion that you show on your last slide; and you can make a link from your title
And people can wait until your last slide to know what is that impact)
Slide#2:
"Direct photon constrains kinematics of recoil jet" It is not clear; can you please elaborate or paraphrase?
Slide#3
Please mention what are these E_cluster, e_i, and r_i in this TSP formula?
Similarly, define all terms in direct photon yield formula below.
(People may be interested to know)
"E_cluster" -> "cluster" should be roman as it is a label and has no value.
Cosmetic suggestion: using these colorful cones at the bottom may confuse people as it may indicate also jet cone. So you need to use a different style to show "shower shape" by pi0 and gamma.
Slide#4
k_T -> make "T" roman style
"- With R = 0.2, 0.5" -> you can add this with upper sentence and remove "-" (Better reading in one go)
"UE effects small in 𝑝+ 𝑝" -> "Negligible effect of UE in p+p"
It would be better to add one sentence mentioning difference between Pt^reco, Pt^raw, and Pt^ch (which is x-axis in the upper plots). I understand this is difficult in limited space, for audience it is probably good to add.
SLide#5
"Different q/g fractions, path length distribution" -> I would prefer to drop this. Only upper bullet is Ok (" pi0 and gamma +jet iAA consistent" as you mentioned)
"…due to jet shape in vacuum" -> "… due to vacuum parton shower "
"Au+Au suppressed relative to 𝑝+𝑝" -> "R^0.2/0.5 in Au+Au less than that in p+p collisions"
"Observation of medium-induced intra-jet broadening" -> "First observation of medium-induced intra-jet broadening in heavy-ion collisions"
Regards
Nihar
On 2022-06-02 02:54, Derek Anderson via Star-hp-l wrote:
Hi all,
Apologies for the tardiness on this, but I've been invited to present
a poster virtually at the RHIC/AGS Annual User's Meeting (June 7th -
10th). The content of the slides is identical to what I presented at
Quark Matter 2022, but pared down to focus on the pp side of the
analysis and the yield ratios. Minor edits to the text here and there
have been made to reflect the narrowing of scope. Comments and
questions are more than welcome!
Thanks!
Derek
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 3:21 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members, Derek Andersonhttps://urldefense.com/v3/__https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59813__;!!KwNVnqRv!CFEyLvw6kOht7t1jbQXdNBCTQhh0k7mLk6am7TMxoGaQbegjPqWYU4bG5VJ6ByGi91DaWnXGbTV_EerjGtafRWyJIRSPeg$
(dmawxc AT physics.tamu.edu) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59813__;!!KwNVnqRv!CFEyLvw6kOht7t1jbQXdNBCTQhh0k7mLk6am7TMxoGaQbegjPqWYU4bG5VJ6ByGi91DaWnXGbTV_EerjGtafRWyJIRSPeg$
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
This Message Is From an External Sender
This message came from outside your organization.
ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
Derek Anderson (dmawxc AT physics.tamu.edu) has submitted a material
for a
review, please have a look:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l__;!!KwNVnqRv!CFEyLvw6kOht7t1jbQXdNBCTQhh0k7mLk6am7TMxoGaQbegjPqWYU4bG5VJ6ByGi91DaWnXGbTV_EerjGtafRWwdbO3UIg$
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review,
webmaster, 06/01/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review,
Derek Anderson, 06/01/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/02/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review,
Derek Anderson, 06/03/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/04/2022
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review, Derek Anderson, 06/04/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/04/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review,
Derek Anderson, 06/03/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 06/02/2022
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Derek Anderson for 2022 RHIC/AGS submitted for review,
Derek Anderson, 06/01/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.