STAR HardProbes PWG

[zhang08 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn]

Hi Barbara, all,

Thank you for Barbara's nice comments. Please find the updated version in the following link.

https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/heavy/shenghui/web/HFE_production_AuAu/paper/AuAu_HFE_paperdraft_v1.pdf

For Barbara, please find my replies to your nice comments in the following link.

https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/heavy/shenghui/web/HFE_production_AuAu/Collaboration/Comments_PWG_Barbara_AuAu.pdf

Certainly, you can also access thees links by our paper webpage.

https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/heavy/shenghui/web/HFE_production_AuAu/

Best,

Shenghui

-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Barbara Trzeciak" <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
发送时间:2022-06-15 21:02:10 (星期三)
收件人: "Yi Yang" <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>, "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
抄送: zhang08 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn
主题: Re: [Star-hp-l] Pointer to HFE Paper Proposal Page in Au+Au collisions

Hi Shenghui, PAs,

Please find my comments to your very nice and clear paper draft below.

In general everything looks good to me, and I think the draft is good to go after the comments are addressed.

And do you keep JHEP as the target journal ?

Since the AN was already reviewed and approved for the b->e paper, I don't have additional comments on it. 

Cheers,

Barbara

L42:  is the negligible ->  is negligible

L106: Experimetnally -> Experimentally

L108: I wouldn't list Hadron contamination within these points, just  add afterwards that the sample of electrons is not pure and contains hadron contamination. Or, change Experimetnally identified electrons to Experimentally identified electron candidates

L120: non-photonic electron -> non-photonic electrons

L129: to suppress -> in order to suppress

L143-144: I would mention here if you use energy measured within a BEMC tower or cluster

Fig. 1 caption: while Boxes represent -> while boxes represent

Fig. 1: I would split it into two figures, the upper and lower rows separately. 

Fig. 2 c): it' shard to see the unc. of the fit and differences between different contributions. If possible, please make the max value of the y axis smaller - you can e..g. split the legend into two columns to have more space. 

L197: gamma -> photon

Sec. 3.3: you don't give much details here. If the idea is that you refer to the other paper, you should write this explicitly here, saying that the methods used here are the same (or follow closely) what was done in other measurements in Ref. [43].

L260-261:  Uncertainties in simulating the HT trigger threshold (± 3.5%) as well as the BSMD identification efficiency are also taken into account -> it's not clear how you estimate these uncertainties.

Tab. 1: for 40-80% unc. on the electron purity is listed up to 76%. It's not clear to me which point on the purity plot has such large uncertainty. Could you please give more details. Also, for the PHE identification efficiency numbers in the AN are lower than 70%.

- Results: I know that you discussed the significance of the difference between the data and PHSD in the replies to PWGC preview. But I think we can still say that PHSD is systematically below our central points for pT > 5 GeV/c.

- It would be good to add Ncoll and Npart values for a given centrality class

- Global uncertainties are not discussed, only mentioned in the figure's caption.

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 6:01 AM Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Shenghui,

I will need another 2-3 weeks to finish your note and draft. 

Cheers,

Yi

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 11:29 AM zhang08--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi All,

Do you have any comments or suggestions for our paper draft of inclusive HFE production?

Best,

Shenghui

-----原始邮件-----
发件人:zhang08 AT mail.ustc.edu.cn
发送时间:2022-05-27 15:13:40 (星期五)
收件人: star-hf-l AT lists.bnl.gov, Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
抄送:
主题: Pointer to HFE Paper Proposal Page in Au+Au collisions

Hi All,

The analysis of inclusive HFE production in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions are ready for PWG review. Please find analysis note and paper draft below. The analysis note is same as that for b->e paper, and reviewed and signed off by PWG and GPC except updating the figure of  RAA vs pT distribution using Duke and PHSD model and adding the RAA vs Npart distribution shown on page 62 of analysis note. You can also find our reply for the comments of PWGC preview below.

Analysis note: https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/heavy/shenghui/web/HFE_production_AuAu/note/AuAu_HFE_anaNote_v3.pdf

Paper draft: https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/heavy/shenghui/web/HFE_production_AuAu/paper/AuAu_HFE_paperdraft_v0.pdf

Reply to comments from PWGC preview: https://www.star.bnl.gov/protected/heavy/shenghui/web/HFE_production_AuAu/Collaboration/Reply_to_Comments_PWGC_Preview.pdf

Any comments or suggestions are welcomed.

Best,

Shenghui

 

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l