STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Andrew,

This shortened version looks good to me.
Just wait for Rongrong and other conveners' comment today (EDT time) 
before submitting tomorrow Jul 1st.

Cheers
Nihar





On 2022-06-30 02:26, Andrew Tamis wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have had to change my abstract to meet submission requirements such
> as character limit.  I have updated it on the drupal page.  Please let
> me know if the shortened version is acceptable.
>
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59931
>
> Best,
> Andrew
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 6:08 AM Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Andrew,
> >
> > Once you implement Yi's comment, we can pass your abstract to
> > startalk.
> >
> > Regards
> > Nihar
> >
> > On 2022-06-22 08:42, Yi Yang wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for the presentation last week. I have a better
> > > understanding of this analysis now.
> > > I have some minor comments/suggestions for your consideration.
> > > L8: Quantum-Chromodynamics --> Quantum Chromodynamics
> > > L12: By plotting --> From (?)
> > > L14: low opening  angles -->  small opening  angles
> > > L20: from both charged tracks from the Time Projec tion Chamber
> > and
> > > calorimeter towers from the Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter.
> > -->
> > > from both charged tracks using Time Projec tion Chamber and Barrel
> > > Electromagnetic Calorimeter.  (?)
> > > L24: Move "These measurements will be compared in this talk with
> > sim
> > > ulation using PYTHIA to evaluate the observable’s susceptibility
> > to
> > > detector effects." to the end of this paragraph. (?)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Yi
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 2:15 AM Andrew Tamis via Star-hp-l
> > > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Sooraj,
> > > >
> > > > L25: I did a toy simulation of detector effects by dropping 20%
> > of
> > > > charged tracks and running jet finding again, to show that the
> > shape
> > > > doesn't change.  And then I did a comparison between data and the
> > > > PYTHIA 6 official embedding with no simulated detector effects.
> > > >
> > > > L27: Done
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 12:39 PM Sooraj Radhakrishnan
> > > > <skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Andrew,
> > > > Thanks for preparing the nice abstract. Just a couple of minor
> > > > comments from me for sign off
> > > >
> > > > L25: full detector simulation with PYTHIA events?
> > > > L27: showcase --> study
> > > >
> > > > Sooraj
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 8:32 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
> > > > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > > > Hello Andrew,
> > > >
> > > > Please find my additional comments.
> > > >
> > > > Line#2: In title , "…GeV  in  STAR"  -> looks like there are
> > extra
> > > > space
> > > > between "GeV__in__STAR", would you please check this?
> > > > Line#19: p+p -> $p+p$ (italic)
> > > > Line#19-20: "   This talk will present  analysis done with jets
> > > > reconstructed.. " -> "This talk will present a measurement of
> > jets
> > > > reconstructed…"
> > > > Line#22: "…approximately …" -> Not sure why it is required to
> > > > mention
> > > > "approximately" here? Is there any reason?
> > > >
> > > > > 8. I use N-point as it is what the attached reference i used
> > > > called
> > > > > them, I think it may be better to maintain cohesion
> > > > Ok, That is fine.
> > > >
> > > > > 10. By Scaling behavior, I mean the expected shape of the curve
> > in
> > > > > that region due to theory predictions.  It is the language used
> > in
> > > > my
> > > > > reference, should I do more to introduce it here?  Perhaps I can
> > > > just
> > > > > change it to curve shape.
> > > > I was trying to understand this "scaling behavior" from that
> > paper;
> > > > I
> > > > will read it again later.
> > > > At this moment you can just keep it as it is.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Nihar
> > > >
> > > > On 2022-06-18 02:37, Andrew Tamis wrote:
> > > > > Hello Nihar,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you very much for the feedback!
> > > > > 1. Done
> > > > > 2. Done
> > > > > 3. Done
> > > > > 4. Done
> > > > > 5. Done
> > > > > 6. Done
> > > > > 7. Done, and attached reference
> > > > >
> > > > > 8. I use N-point as it is what the attached reference i used
> > > > called
> > > > > them, I think it may be better to maintain cohesion
> > > > > 9. Done
> > > > > 10. By Scaling behavior, I mean the expected shape of the curve
> > in
> > > > > that region due to theory predictions.  It is the language used
> > in
> > > > my
> > > > > reference, should I do more to introduce it here?  Perhaps I can
> > > > just
> > > > > change it to curve shape.
> > > > >
> > > > > 11. By the time of the talk, I may not have unfolding ready at a
> > > > level
> > > > > that I am willing to show, but I still believe it is helpful to
> > > > > mention that I will show data, and the sentence mentioning
> > "first
> > > > > studies" may be vague enough to not overrepresent what I will be
> > > > > bringing.  I believe that showing that the detector level data
> > > > > exhibits the same behavior to constituent pt cuts as the PYTHIA
> > > > > simulations contains useful information.
> > > > >
> > > > > 12. Done
> > > > > 13. Done
> > > > > 14. Done
> > > > > 15. Done
> > > > > 16. Done
> > > > > 17. Done
> > > > >
> > > > > I have made these changes and several others that were
> > suggested.
> > > > The
> > > > > updated abstract is here
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/DNP-2022/Correlators-pp-Collisions-Sqrts200GeV-STAR
> > > > > Thank you,
> > > > > Andrew Tamis
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 6:14 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
> > > > > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hello Andrew,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you for your plan to perform this new measurement in
> > STAR.
> > > > > > Please find my comment and suggestions on your abstract.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 1. Title- "Correlators in pp Collisions at √s = 200GeV from
> > > > STAR"
> > > > > > I think title needs more information to convey about
> > "N-particle
> > > > > > energy
> > > > > > correlator in jet".
> > > > > > Something like "Measurement of energy correlators within jet in
> > > > p+p
> > > > > > collisions at √s = 200GeV in STAR"
> > > > > > Or "Measurement of 2-particle energy correlators within jet in
> > > > p+p
> > > > > > collisions at √s = 200GeV in STAR"
> > > > > > 2. Andrew Tamis -> Andrew Tamis (for the STAR collaboration)
> > > > > > 3. "Within high energy collisions, Jets are a unique…"
> > > > > > -> "Jet is a unique…hard-scattered quarks and gluons in high
> > > > > > energy
> > > > > > collision experiment."
> > > > > > 4."…in Jet-finding…" -> "… in jet-finding.."
> > > > > > 5."..allow for increased study…" -> "…allow for detailed
> > > > > > study…"
> > > > > > 6."…the quark/gluon shower, fragmentation, and
> > > > > > the resulting final hadrons." -> "the quark/gluon shower,
> > > > > > fragmentation,
> > > > > > and the hadronization in the Quantum-Chromodynamics."
> > > > > > 7. "…within jets defines an observable that probes…" ->
> > need
> > > > to
> > > > > > introduce here what is that observable ? For example,
> > "…within
> > > > > > jets
> > > > > > defines an observable, the N-particle energy correlator in jet,
> > > > that
> > > > > > probes…" ; the introduction of this observable may need
> > > > reference
> > > > > > so
> > > > > > please provide reference of previous study.
> > > > > > 8. "N-point" ->  "N-particle" would be clearer.
> > > > > > 9. "re-contextualize" -> "recontextualize"
> > > > > > 10. "By plotting the 2-point energy correlator as a function of
> > > > > > opening
> > > > > > angle, one can determine the crossover region from where the
> > > > scaling
> > > > > > behavior of the correlator changes from scaling as a random
> > > > > > distribution
> > > > > > of hadrons at low opening angles, to scaling as quarks and
> > gluons
> > > > > > dominated by perturbative interactions at large opening
> > angles."
> > > > ->
> > > > > > Please break this statement and paraphrase it. Not sure what is
> > > > this
> > > > > > "scaling"?
> > > > > > 11. Second para, I would prefer to start with "In this talk,
> > the
> > > > > > study
> > > > > > of 2-point energy correlator in jet will be discussed using
> > > > PYTHIA
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > STAR grant simulation using kinematic coverage of the STAR
> > > > > > experiment."
> > > > > > (Or Something similar to this) So that we will not be saying
> > > > > > explicitly
> > > > > > to show the results from p+p data at this moment in the
> > abstract.
> > > > > > But at
> > > > > > the end this abstract, you could mention STAR plan to perform
> > > > this
> > > > > > analysis where you could show some preliminary plots in your
> > talk
> > > > if
> > > > > > you
> > > > > > could have by that time. [I think this what we discussed at our
> > > > last
> > > > > > meeting]. Please let me know what do you think.
> > > > > > 12. "The correlation functions were approximated.." -> "The
> > > > > > correlation
> > > > > > functions are approximate…"
> > > > > > 13. "…y-φ space…" -> "… rapidity-azimuthal angle phase
> > > > > > space…"
> > > > > > 14. "…approximated via multiplicity histograms of the opening
> > > > > > angle…" ->
> > > > > > "…approximated by the distribution of the opening angle…
> > > > > > 15. "simulations in PYTHIA" -> "simulation using PYTHIA"
> > > > > > 16. "selections on overall" -> "selections on the overall"
> > > > > > 17. "pT" -> "transverse momentum ($ p_{\rm T}$)"
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > Nihar
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 2022-06-11 02:10, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > > > > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Andrew Tamis (andrew.tamis AT yale.edu) has submitted a material
> > > > for
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > review,
> > > > > > > please have a look:
> > > > > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/59931
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please
> > contact
> > > > > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > > > > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > > > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Sooraj Radhakrishnan
> > > >
> > > > Research Scientist,
> > > > Department of Physics
> > > >
> > > > Kent State University
> > > > Kent, OH 44243
> > > >
> > > > Physicist Postdoctoral AffiliateNuclear Science Division
> > > > Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
> > > > MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
> > > > Berkeley, CA 94720
> > > > Ph: 510-495-2473 [1]
> > > >
> > > > Email: skradhakrishnan AT lbl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > >
> > >
> > > Links:
> > > ------
> > > [1] tel:%28510%29%20495-2473