STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hi Raghav,

Yes, It is Ok now with current form.
Because it is good to motivate/remind in the initial slides that in STAR 
we have also jet substructure measurement.

Regards
Nihar

On 2022-10-03 19:36, Raghav Kunnawalkam Elayavalli wrote:
> Hi Monika, Nihar,
>
> Just a quick point - I would probably still include either the ATLAS
> or ALICE lund plane projection plot just to point out that there are
> measurements out there that go beyond the first splitting, but they
> essentially integrate over the split numbers. this is why our
> measurement of separating the observables at the first, second and
> third is unique compared to theirs.
>
> Cheers
> Raghav
>
> **************************************
> First Name - Raghav
> Last Name - Kunnawalkam Elayavalli
> email - raghav.ke AT vanderbilt.edu
> website - https://www.raghavke.me [1]
>
> RHIC/AGS UEC member
> Assistant Professor of Physics
> Stevenson Center 6410
> Physics & Astronomy Department
> Vanderbilt University
> Nashville, TN 37235-1807
> <he/them>
> **************************************
>
> > On Oct 3, 2022, at 8:59 AM, Monika Robotková via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Nihar,
> > Thank you very much for your useful comments, I've implemented them
> > and uploaded v2 on Drupal page. Below are responses to your
> > questions:
> >
> > Slide#7
> > _Right side ATLAS plot: Not sure if there is any relevance to show
> > ATLAS's this plots.
> > If you want to emphasis on Jet substructure pQCD and non-pQCD
> > discussion, you could include STAR's jet M, Rg, Zg, etc., results.
> > Is there anything you want to point out here that I missed?
> >
> > I just wanted to point out that there are substructure measurements
> > also in other experiments and say why our measurement is new, but I
> > switched the plots and included STAR results.
> >
> > Slide#8:
> > _On right plot, what do you want to say here? What is the relevance
> > to
> > your presentation and results? Do you have plan to do similar
> > measurement in Au+Au in STAR?
> >
> > See response above. On the last slide, I would like to say that we
> > plan to do differential measurements in Au+Au but using EEC.
> >
> > Slide#17-18:
> > Do you have plan to include any of PYTHIA MC results for these data?
> >
> > I added one slide with MC comparisons.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Monika
> > -------------------------
> >
> > Od: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> za uživatele Nihar
> > Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> > Odesláno: 1. října 2022 8:19:42
> > Komu: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov; STAR HardProbes PWG
> > Předmět: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for
> > Hot Quarks 2022 submitted for review
> >
> > Hello Monika,
> >
> > Please find my comments below  on your nice presentation slides.
> >
> > Slide#4
> > Anti-Kt, Cambridge/Aachen -> please give references (although it is
> > know
> > to all)
> >
> > Slide#7
> > _Right side ATLAS plot: Not sure if there is any relevance to show
> > ATLAS's this plots.
> > If you want to emphasis on Jet substructure pQCD and non-pQCD
> > discussion, you could include STAR's jet M, Rg, Zg, etc., results.
> > Is there anything you want to point out here that I missed?
> >
> > _On Bullet p+p Collisions, I think it is important to mention the
> > physics why in p+p collision it is important to study jet
> > substructure
> > observable?  That is "to study vacuum QCD shower at RHIC energy"
> > along
> > with "comparison with QCD predictions and tuning of MC generator"
> > are
> > other motivations.
> >
> > _Fourth bullet is redundant, you can remove it. As in p+p collisions
> > you
> > already mention this (see above comment)
> >
> > Slide#8:
> > _On right plot, what do you want to say here? What is the relevance
> > to
> > your presentation and results? Do you have plan to do similar
> > measurement in Au+Au in STAR?
> >
> > Slide#9:
> > _A bit confuse with the text.
> > "To ways how to…" -> do you want to say "Two ways to study…" or
> > "Ways to
> > study parton shower…"
> >
> > Slide#11
> > _Reconstruction of charged particle tracks -> "Charged particle
> > identification for jet reconstruction"
> > _Reconstruction of neutral component… -> "Detection of neutral
> > particles
> > for jet reconstruction"
> > _"Segmentation" -> Granularity
> > _ "Resolution parameters" -> "Jet resolution parameters:"
> > _"Located at the RHIC…" ->"Located at RHIC…"
> >
> > Slide#13:
> > _"… and obtain particle-level distribution" -> "and obtain true
> > (particle-level) distribution"
> > _"… pT,jet bit…" -> pT,jet bin,
> >
> > Slide#17-18:
> > Do you have plan to include any of PYTHIA MC results for these data?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Nihar
> >
> > On 2022-09-29 02:23, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material
> > for a
> > > review, please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/61206
> > >
> > > Deadline: 2022-10-11
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.raghavke.me__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!Du99ggg1R_KFobOo89BWTATnofkOdGFlNN7AqrkFh6oXqM59uV7yimt3V7NbGrnH_NRZZcFHWpViU83m7sVuIVeKp0kEgRM$