star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
- From: "Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>
- To: Helen Caines via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, Helen Caines <helen.caines AT yale.edu>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] Track merging cut follow up
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2023 10:52:50 +0000
Hello Helen and all,
Thank you for this comment. You are right, we will apply merging cut for both same-events (signal) and mix-events (combinatorial
background) samples.
Regards,
Priyanka
From: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Helen Caines via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 6:21 PM
To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Star-hp-l] Track merging cut follow up
Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2023 6:21 PM
To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: [Star-hp-l] Track merging cut follow up
HI Priyanka, All,
I’m quickly following up on the merging discussion we just had. You should certainly also check with your local HT experts. However, I went and looked at the analysis note of one of our recent HBT papers #273 "Flow and interferometry results
from Au+Au collisions at sqrt(sNN) = 4.5 GeV" (https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Analysis_Note_for_FXT_Au_Au_collisions.pdf)
It says on page 72:
"2.
Pair Cuts
This analysis uses pion pairs with an average momentum
kT
= (p1
+
p2)/2
in the range 0.15
< kT
<
0.60 GeV.HBT analyses have two standard anti-merging and anti-splitting cuts. Single-track effects are common to both same-event and mixed-event pairs, and largely cancel from the correlation function, which is the ratio of these two. However, two-track artifacts can affect the numerator and denominator differently, and thus distort the shape of the correlation function, particularly at low relative momentum q = (p1 −p2).16
Track splitting (where hits from one charged particle are reconstructed as two distinct tracks) artificially enhances same-event pairs at low q. A topological cut was applied to all pairs that required each track in the pair to register distinct TPC hits on a minimum fraction of padrows. This splitting level, as it is known, is constrained to be in the range -0.5 ≤ SL ≤ 0.6. Track merging (where hits from two charged particles are reconstructed as one track) suppresses same-event low q pairs. These pairs can not be recovered, but similar pairs can be removed from the mixed-event distribution to compensate. An anti-merging cut analyses cases where both tracks in a pair have hits on the same TPC padrows, and determines the likelihood that these hits would have been merged by the track reconstruction algorithm. We require all pairs to have a fraction of merged hits FM H < 10%“
this is method that I was proposing you should be using. Can you point us to the analysis/method note that you are looking at? Maybe there is a different technique used when D0/V0s are involved in the correlation analysis?
Helen
***********************
Yale University
Physics Dept. - Wright Lab.
PO Box 208120
New Haven, CT 06520
203-432-5831
***********************
she/her/hers
"Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass.
It's about learning how to dance in the rain." - Vivian Greene
Physics Dept. - Wright Lab.
PO Box 208120
New Haven, CT 06520
203-432-5831
***********************
she/her/hers
"Life is not about waiting for the storms to pass.
It's about learning how to dance in the rain." - Vivian Greene
-
[Star-hp-l] Track merging cut follow up,
Helen Caines, 01/05/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] Track merging cut follow up, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 01/06/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.