Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Nihar Sahoo for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
  • To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Nihar Sahoo for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 11:17:09 +0100

Hi Nihar,

nice slides. 
Please find below my first comments. 

- s2: precision measurement -> precision measurements
- s2: missing STAR logo
- s3: I would quote the trigger rate from the previous runs that you show results from (or just remove it). You can mention the new higher rate on slide 18. 
- s3: other detectors are mostly the ones that are most relevant to the analyses that you're showing. 
The slide makes a different impression, as your main detectors being eTOF, iTPC, ... sTGC. 
- s6: rho equation is small, try to put both equations either at the top or bottom of the plots.. And we should see from Tanmay's studies if we can make a less general statement about the PYTHIA-8 Detroit tune.
- s8: you would add the SoftDrop condition that we use. It's a bit technical, but it's Hard Probes audience. 
- s8-9: I would swap the order - first you say that the amount of the groomed away mass regulates the angular splitting (anti-correlated with Rg) of the first split and then that the mass sharing of that hard splitting and Rg are mostly uncorrelated 
- s12: the right published plots are not needed, the result is shown on Gabe's plot. 
I think it would be good to also show the plot with pT const. > 3 GeV/c where we see no enhancement w.r.t pp, and have consistent conclusions with Gabe's slides once they are finalised. 
- s16: system and energy dependence -> system and energy dependence at similar <N_part>
- s16: under v2 part: Indication of small regeneration effect and/or small charm quark flow
- s18: we rather won't have 28 Cryo-weeks this year, and luminosities next year might change as well. I suggest removing the Cryo-weeks and luminosities for years 23-25 and just write high luminosities for runs 2023-2025, and you can add the updated trigger rate.  
- s18: (Precision jet and heavy-flavor measurements) -> Precision jet and heavy-flavor measurements
- s19: for similar <N_part> we see ~same suppression of high pT particles and J/psi for different systems
I would suggest to add a bullet:  Suppression of J/psi and high-pT hadrons mainly determined by <N_part>

Cheers,
Barbara

On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 8:47 AM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Nihar Sahoo (nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov) has submitted a material for a review, 
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63016

Deadline: 2022-12-05
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page