Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
  • To: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 10:52:07 +0530

Hello Priyanka,

Please find my comments on your nice poster.

Abstract:
"…D0-K, D0-proton pairs…" -> "…D0-K, and D0-proton pairs…"

I.Motivation
"Area of homogeneity (Fig. 1)" -> Figure-1: Area of homogeneity"

II.Methodology
"Fig 3.: k* in pair-rest frame" -> "Figure-3: Femtoscopic correlation and k* in pair-rest frame"
"…correlated and uncorrelated pairs." -> "…correlated and uncorrelated pairs in an event ensemble."
"N" make same font style of as in the equation.
"Event mixing technique to calculate k* for uncorrelated pairs" -> "Event mixing technique to calculate k* for uncorrelated pairs using the real events"

III. Experiment:…
"HFT(…) Directly…" -> "HFT (…): Directly…" or "HFT(…) directly …";
"Plot 1, 2: Particle identification (PID) using TOF and TPC respectively" -> "Figure-6: Particle identification (PID) using TOF (left) and TPC (right)."
(No need to use Fig and plot separately)
"Ref. (plot 1,2 and fig. 5): PHYSICAL REVIEW C 99, 034908 (2019)" -> "STAR: PRC 99, 034908 (2019)"
(This is enough to cite)


IV. Analysis & Outcomes

BG-> background
Could you make a better resolution for these two plots? (This is your hard work and first time showing outside)
"Plot 3-4: pT dependence of D0 invariant mass" -> "Figure-7: pT dependence of D0 invariant mass
"PairPurity" -> "Pair Purity"
"Track id (Hadron) ≠ Track id (D0K-/π+)"-> this is not clear; you may rephrase this.
"Track splitting: No. of hits / Max no. of hits" No need to mention technical terms. Simple use "Additional track quality cuts on TPC hits"
"between hits" -> "between TPC hits"

"Systematic uncertainty calculations for C(k*) are under progress" Not required here. Please drop it.


"How the correlation functions should look like?
We can’t predict the shape because this kind of analysis hasn’t done before. Moreover, QGP and hadronic phase effects are unknown."

I would not be critic of our own analysis in this poster, better to highlight positive aspect of this analysis and say what you mention in Motivation section.
How about?

Work in progress to study the correlation between D^0 and p/pi/k in Au+Au collisions
->Provides information on nature of interactions between charm and light quarks in QGP medium.


Summary:
"Model study (ex. Lednický–Lyuboshitz) is required…" -> "Model study (ex. Lednický–Lyuboshitz) is ongoing…"
"Theoretical or simulation studies are not available." -> "Theory inputs are required to explore the nature of interaction" (Put this bullet at the end)


Cheers
Nihar







On 2023-03-22 01:56, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Priyanka Roy Chowdhury (priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl) has submitted
a material for a review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63036

Deadline: 2023-03-26
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page