Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Isaac Mooney for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>
  • To: "Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Isaac Mooney for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:06:41 +0000

Hello Isaac

One quick comment: to avoid any possible physics interpretation of the v2^obs vs. q2 plot, I suggest to normalize the y-axis with <v2^obs>, i.e., averaged over all q2 bins. In this way, you can still show the positive correlation without showing the actual v2^obs values. Thanks. 

Best
Rongrong

On Mar 22, 2023, at 10:38 AM, Mooney, Isaac via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi all,

I’ve posted a draft of the poster. I sincerely apologize for the delay in getting this to the list. I will make every effort to make sure it doesn’t happen again.
Note on the final two plots: the 2D histogram is on the full (Ru) dataset; the v2 plot is the result of a suggestion from the FCV PWG to demonstrate that q2 has some sensitivity to anisotropy, and I will increase the statistics used, probably with the next draft I send out. As this is v2-obs and not the v2 corrected for event plane resolution, it is not a “physics" plot.
For both plots I know there are labels that need to be added, and beautification to be done, but I will also take care of that in the next iteration.

Thanks for your consideration,
Isaac




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page