STAR HardProbes PWG

["Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" <priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl>]

Hello all,

Please find my updated poster here https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/HP2023_poster_v5.pdf

Regards,

Priyanka

---

From: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov> on behalf of Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2023 6:22 AM
To: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov <webmaster AT star.bnl.gov>; STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Priyanka Roy Chowdhury for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review

 

Hello Priyanka,

Please find my comments on your nice poster.

Abstract:
"…D0-K, D0-proton pairs…" -> "…D0-K, and D0-proton pairs…"

I.Motivation
"Area of homogeneity (Fig. 1)" -> Figure-1: Area of homogeneity"

II.Methodology
"Fig 3.: k* in pair-rest frame" -> "Figure-3: Femtoscopic correlation
and k* in pair-rest frame"
"…correlated and uncorrelated pairs." -> "…correlated and uncorrelated
pairs in an event ensemble."
"N" make same font style of as in the equation.
"Event mixing technique to calculate k* for uncorrelated pairs" ->
"Event mixing technique to calculate k* for uncorrelated pairs using the
real events"

III. Experiment:…
"HFT(…) Directly…" -> "HFT (…): Directly…" or "HFT(…) directly …";
"Plot 1, 2: Particle identification (PID) using TOF and TPC
respectively" -> "Figure-6: Particle identification (PID) using TOF
(left) and TPC (right)."
(No need to use Fig and plot separately)
"Ref. (plot 1,2 and fig. 5): PHYSICAL REVIEW C 99, 034908 (2019)" ->
"STAR: PRC 99, 034908 (2019)"
(This is enough to cite)


IV. Analysis & Outcomes

BG-> background
Could you make a better resolution for these two plots? (This is your
hard work and first time showing outside)
"Plot 3-4: pT dependence of D0 invariant mass" -> "Figure-7: pT
dependence of D0 invariant mass
"PairPurity" -> "Pair Purity"
"Track id (Hadron) ≠ Track id (D0K-/π+)"-> this is not clear; you may
rephrase this.
"Track splitting: No. of hits / Max no. of hits" No need to mention
technical terms. Simple use "Additional track quality cuts on TPC hits"
"between hits" -> "between TPC hits"

"Systematic uncertainty calculations for C(k*) are under progress" Not
required here. Please drop it.


"How the correlation functions should look like?
We can’t predict the shape because this kind of analysis hasn’t done
before. Moreover, QGP and hadronic phase effects are unknown."

I would not be critic of our own analysis in this poster, better to
highlight positive aspect of this analysis and say what you mention in
Motivation section.
How about?

Work in progress to study the correlation between D^0 and p/pi/k in
Au+Au collisions
->Provides information on nature of interactions between charm and light
quarks in QGP medium.


Summary:
"Model study (ex. Lednický–Lyuboshitz) is required…" -> "Model study
(ex. Lednický–Lyuboshitz) is ongoing…"
"Theoretical or simulation studies are not available." -> "Theory inputs
are required to explore the nature of interaction" (Put this bullet at
the end)


Cheers
Nihar







On 2023-03-22 01:56, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Priyanka Roy Chowdhury (priyanka.roy_chowdhury.dokt AT pw.edu.pl) has
> submitted
> a material for a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63036
>
> Deadline: 2023-03-26
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l