star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe)
- From: "Evdokimov, Olga" <evdolga AT uic.edu>
- To: "Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>, STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>, "Dale-Gau, Gabe" <gdaleg2 AT uic.edu>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe)
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 22:02:21 +0000
Dear Rongrong,
For biggest jets we, naturally, have the smallest acceptance. The plot on slide 4 shows correlations for R=0.3 jets; these are reconstructed up to (1-R)=0.7 in eta, which together with the charged hadron selection of +/- 0.5 give the deta acceptance of +/-1.2
For your second question – one could not use |deta|<0.5 for UE; this is where the jet peak sits. Please take a look at slide 5 where jet and EU regions are sketched to illustrate this. If you propose to use +/- 0.5 in deta but “go away” from jet in dphi – we have considered this possibility in this and other such analyses, and this route is prohibited by the vn presence and the unknown jet-to-RP coupling (as well as presence of away side quenched jet which is not modeled well in any event generators to date).
Best regards, Olga
From: Star-hp-l <star-hp-l-bounces AT lists.bnl.gov>
On Behalf Of Ma, Rongrong via Star-hp-l
Hello Gabe, Olga
Thanks for your responses.
For R = 0.5 jets, I understand that the eta cut o jets is |eta_jet| < 0.5. Do you also use |eta_track| < 0.5 cut which limits the dEta range from -1 to 1? It does not seem to be the case as one can see entries beyond |dEta| = 1 on slide 4. If your cut on tracks is |eta_track| < 1.0, it shouldn't be so difficult to get to |dEta| = 1, right?
On the second backup slide, you show the dEta distribution for UE (red points). Do you use UE within 0.5 < |dEta| < 1.0 for the projection of dPhi? If so, why not use the |dEta| < 0.5 range? Actually, how do you get the entries within |dEta| < 0.5 in the first place given that the UE semi-circles are far away from the jet axis in eta?
Sorry for these naive questions. I should have followed the analysis more closely.
Best Rongrong
|
-
[Star-hp-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Gabe Dale-Gau, 03/21/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Ma, Rongrong, 03/22/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe), Evdokimov, Olga, 03/22/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Gabe Dale-Gau, 03/22/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Ma, Rongrong, 03/22/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Evdokimov, Olga, 03/22/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Ma, Rongrong, 03/22/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Evdokimov, Olga, 03/22/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe), Ma, Rongrong, 03/23/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Evdokimov, Olga, 03/22/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Ma, Rongrong, 03/22/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Evdokimov, Olga, 03/22/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Ma, Rongrong, 03/22/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] [Star-talks-l] Updated Slides for Hard Probes 2023 (Gabe),
Ma, Rongrong, 03/22/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.