Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
  • To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 22:24:06 +0100

Hi Brennan,

nice poster. Below are my comments.

Abstract:
√s =200 = √s = 200 (missing space)

Motivation:
- 7x increase in luminosity (~700M events) - I guess here you mean HT triggered data ? It's better then to provide the integrated luminosity 
And I'm trying to understand 7x more. For p+p at 200 GeV we had HT0 (HT2) triggers for the published data, with luminosity of 1.36 (23.5) pb−1. You're using HT1 with 80 pb−1 (600M events) and we also have HT2 for 2017 data with 340 pb−1 (450M events).  How did you get your number ? 
- The Color Octet Model is the currently leading candidate mechanism - I wouldn't fully agree with this. That depends on the pT range. NRQCD (with both color single and color octet) and CEM can reasonably describe cross sections. 
I would just state that we have different models on the market: Color SIngle Model, (CGC+) Non-Relativistic Quantum Chromodynamics and (Improved) Color Evaporation model
Or replace this bullet explaining why production vs multiplicity: constrain model calculations + interplay of soft and hard processes
- vs. event multiplicity -> vs charged-particle multiplicity

The STAR Experiment:
- Electromagnetic Calorimeter -> Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (also BEMC on the STAR picture)
- Why do you specifically mention geometric coverage in eta and phi for TOF, not for the other detectors as well ?

Event Selection:
- Add the trigger threshold in E_T
Particle ID Cuts:
- Define nSigma_e

Signal Extraction:
- Enlarge font of the inv. mass plot . Remove "Mult: 7-8"
- The equations are too small, you can reduce them. 
- unlike-sign pairs -> unlike-sign e^+e- pairs (same for like sign)

Cheers,
Barbara

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:16 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Brennan Schaefer (brennanschaefer AT hotmail.com) has submitted a material for a 
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63064

Deadline: 2023-03-26
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page