star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
- From: Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
- To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review
- Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 22:24:06 +0100
Hi Brennan,
nice poster. Below are my comments.
Abstract:
√s =200 = √s = 200 (missing space)
Motivation:
- 7x increase in luminosity (~700M events) - I guess here you mean HT triggered data ? It's better then to provide the integrated luminosity
And I'm trying to understand 7x more. For p+p at 200 GeV we had HT0 (HT2) triggers for the published data, with luminosity of 1.36 (23.5) pb−1. You're using HT1 with 80 pb−1 (600M events) and we also have HT2 for 2017 data with 340 pb−1 (450M events). How did you get your number ?
- The Color Octet Model is the currently leading candidate
mechanism - I wouldn't fully agree with this. That depends on the pT range. NRQCD (with both color single and color octet) and CEM can reasonably describe cross sections.
I would just state that we have different models on the market: Color SIngle Model, (CGC+) Non-Relativistic Quantum Chromodynamics and (Improved) Color Evaporation model
Or replace this bullet explaining why production vs multiplicity: constrain model calculations + interplay of soft and hard processes
- vs.
event multiplicity -> vs charged-particle multiplicity
The STAR Experiment:
- Electromagnetic Calorimeter -> Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (also BEMC on the STAR picture)
- Why do you specifically mention geometric coverage in eta and phi for TOF, not for the other detectors as well ?
Event Selection:
- Add the trigger threshold in E_T
Particle ID Cuts:
- Define nSigma_e
Signal Extraction:
- Enlarge font of the inv. mass plot . Remove "Mult: 7-8"
- The equations are too small, you can reduce them.
- unlike-sign pairs -> unlike-sign e^+e- pairs (same for like sign)
Cheers,
Barbara
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 2:16 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
Brennan Schaefer (brennanschaefer AT hotmail.com) has submitted a material for a
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63064
Deadline: 2023-03-26
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
-
[Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
webmaster, 03/23/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Barbara Trzeciak, 03/23/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Brennan Schaefer, 03/23/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review, Anders Knospe, 03/23/2023
- Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review, Yi Yang, 03/24/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Brennan Schaefer, 03/23/2023
-
Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Brennan Schaefer for Hard Probes 2023 submitted for review,
Barbara Trzeciak, 03/23/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.