STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Robert,

Please find my additional comments on this merged abstract.
With these implemented, I sign off.

L13: pT-threshold  -> $p_{\rm T}$ threshold.
L19: pT,jet -> jet transverse momentum
L26-28:	"The exploration of the medium-induced acoplanarity over a wide 
phase space, including the low-pT region for large jet radius, is 
presented as well. " Drop this sentence as we have not seen any result 
so far and no proposal was discussed in QM status presentation by PAs.

Cheers
Nihar



On 2023-04-20 21:30, Robert Líčeník wrote:
> Hi Barbara and Nihar,
>
> thank you very much for your useful comments and suggestions.
> I have adopted most of them along with some additional suggestions
> received internally and you can find the new version at the link
> below:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2023/Measurement-inclusive-and-semi-inclusive-jet-production-heavy-ion-co
>
> Please see some comments below
>
> > Line13: "to remove uncorrelated combinatorial background." -> "to
> > mitigate uncorrelated background in present heavy-ion collisions."
> > Line13-14: "The reported distributions are fully corrected for any
> > remaining background fluctuations and detector effects using
> > unfolding
> > techniques." -> "The reported jet distributions are fully corrected
> > for
> > the heavy-ion background fluctuations and the detector effects using
> > the
> > unfolding techniques.
>
> We would prefer to keep this as is, since we want to distinguish
> between the two different approaches of the two analyses regarding
> background suppression.
>
> > Line16-20:" The high…with the charged particle jets." -> "The
> > inclusive
> > full jet reconstruction is carried out up to jet $p_{T,jet}$ ~ 50
> > GeV/c
> > with resolution parameter R=0.2-0.4 using Au+Au collisions data
> > taken in
> > 2014. This extends the kinematic range significantly compared with
> > the
> > previous charged particle jet measurement."
> > [high-statiscs no needed to mention here; BEMC trigger selection not
> >
> > needed in this abstract, already  a lot of info]
>
> We would prefer to keep the BEMC trigger information there as it is
> the key reason for why we can achieve such kinematic reach.
>
> > L24-26: As per Yang's last QM status discussion, there was no
> > mention of
> > jet acoplanarity measurement. If that is the case, please drop this
> > sentence.
>
> I asked Yang to clarify this statement.
>
> Please have a look at the new version and let me know how it reads and
> whether you have any additional comments/suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Robert