STAR HardProbes PWG

["Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov>]

Hello Gaohan

In the interest of time, here are some comments for your consideration. 

General
- Unify the reference style in terms of size

s3
- suggested to be -> suggested as
- medium-induced -> Medium-induced
- feed-down -> Feed-down
- Use a different background color for "Other effects"

s4
- Trigger on elector with p_T
- Trigger on muon with p_T
- identify muon -> Identify muon
- add the azimuthal coverage to each sub-system

s5
- embedding sample -> simulation with detector effects
- though is determined with -> with its shape determined using

s6
- The results -> Results

s7
- in isobar and in Au+Au collisions -> in isobar collisions as in Au+Au 
collisions

s8
- Title: System -> System size
- collisions species -> collision species
- Left figure
-- remove "0-10%", "10-30%" and "30-60%" at the top of the figure since they 
only apply to AuAu, not Isobar
-- move "STAR Preliminary" to the right a bit
-- In the legend, add "PRL2023" to Au+Au as done in the right figure

s9
- a increading trend of Υ(1S) -> an increasing trend of Υ(1S) R_AA

s10
- at the LHC and RHIC Au+Au collision energies -> at RHIC and the LHC
- less suppression of -> less suppression for

s11
- dissociation+regeneration+CNM+elastic and inelastic scatterings -> elastic 
and inelastic scatterings+correlated regeneration+CNM (elastic and inelastic 
scatterings are the mechanisms that lead to dissociation)

s12
- are measurment -> are measured
- Sequential suppression partten is observed in Au+Au collsions -> Consistent 
with sequential suppression pattern
- at the same <Npart>, suppression driven by system size (<Npart>) -> at the 
same <Npart>: suppression driven by system size
- suppression as observed -> suppression at RHIC as observed

Best
Rongrong


> On Apr 22, 2023, at 12:01 AM, gaohan_yang via Star-hp-l 
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> 
> Dear conveners,
> 
> In case you missed my updated, there is a gentle reminder. I understand you 
> are busy with reviewing QM abstracts, but the deadline for(2023-04-24) is 
> fast approaching. If you have any comments please feel free let me know.
> 
> Best Wishes,
> Gaohan
> ---- Replied Message ----
> From  gaohan_yang via Star-hp-l<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Date  4/20/2023 14:48
> To    nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov<nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> ,
> Barbara Trzeciak<barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
> Cc    star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Subject       Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Gaohan Yang for ATHIC 
> 2023 submitted for review
> Hi Nihar, Yi and Barbara
> 
> Thank you for your nice and valuable comments. I have implemented them in 
> the updated version under the same link:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/ATHIC-2023/Measurement-Upsilon-production-heavy-ion-collisions-top-RHIC-energy-STAR-de
> 
> Best regards,
> Gaohan 
> 
>       
> gaohan_yang
> gaohan_yang AT m.scnu.edu.cn
> ---- Replied Message ----
> From  Barbara Trzeciak<barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
> Date  4/19/2023 15:36
> To    Nihar Sahoo<nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> ,
> STAR HardProbes PWG<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
> Cc    gaohan_yang<gaohan_yang AT m.scnu.edu.cn>
> Subject       Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Gaohan Yang for ATHIC 
> 2023 submitted for review
> Hi Gauhan,
> 
> thanks for the update and responses. The slides look very nice. 
> I sign off the following comments:
> 
> - s3: Remove dots at the end of the sentences to be consistent with the 
> rest of the slides.
> in the RHIC energy -> at RHIC energies
> ccbar: Sizable CNM effect(other than NPDF) - these effects are significant 
> for J/psi at low pT < 2 GeV/c, and I don't think we know that the effects 
> beyond nPDFs are sizable - our data are consistent with nPDFs only as well. 
> bbar: we don't really know how much of different CNM effects we have. 
> Therefore, I would suggest removing CNM from the boxes and adding a bullet 
> about  the CNM effect outside of the boxes, e.g.:
> - Other effects: Cold Nuclear Matter (CNM), medium-induced energy loss, 
> feed-down ...
> For bbbar you can add a bullet in the box, e.g.: "Sequential suppression -> 
> cleaner "QGP thermometer"
> 
> - s5: Increase a bit the size of the text.  
> You have twice "(dotted line)" in the 3rd bullet. 
> 
> - s7: observed with that in Au+Au -> observed in isobar and in Au+Au
> in 0-80% isobar collisions is observed -> in 0-80% isobar collisions
> Plot: missing space between "Isobar" and  "\sqrt{s_NN}"
> 
> - s8: System dependence of R_AA -> System dependence of R_AA at 200 GeV
> I suggest adding a conclusion bullet:  No significant species dependence of 
> the suppression at similar <N_part>
> Plot: Add energy of the collisions
> - s9: R_AA distribution as a function -> R_AA as a function
> No significant pT dependence -> No significant pT dependence in Au+Au and 
> isobar collisions
> Add the paper reference to the Au+Au plot
> - s10: and RHIC collision energies -> and RHIC Au+Au collision energies
> less suppression of Υ(2S) -> less suppression of Υ(2S) at RHIC
> - s12: remove "(Coupled Boltzmann eq is also consistent)"
> 
> Cheers,
> Barbara
> 
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:00 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l 
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> Hello Gaohan,
> 
> Thank you for preparing this nice presentation.
> I have minor comments below and with these implemented I sign off.
> 
> Slide-4:
> "Barrel Electro Magnetic Calorimeter" -> "Barrel ElectroMagnetic 
> Calorimeter"
> Slide-11
> Please provide references to all these models
> 
> Cheers
> Nihar
> 
> 
> 
> On 2023-04-18 23:11, gaohan_yang via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > Hi, Barbara
> > 
> > Thank you for your valuable comments and patient response.  I have
> > implemented them and uploaded version2 on the Drupal page which can be
> > found in this link:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Athic_Upsilon_Production_V2_0.pdf
> > 
> > 
> > Please see my detailed responses inline:
> > 
> > |-General suggestion for your consideration: you don't necessarily
> > need to divide your presentation into Au+Au and isobar -> you can show
> > the published results in Au+Au, then isobar and isobar compared to
> > Au+Au, and then model and LHC comparisons at the end.
> > — I have adjusted the order and content of the slides according to
> > your comments. If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.
> > |-Why in the table do you specifically show 30-60% for Au+Au and 0-80%
> > for Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr ?
> > I would rather show for which centrality bins that you have the
> > <N_coll> are similar between the systems.
> > — Yes, we compared the two systems based on the number of  similar
> > N_parts. Maybe my table didn't explain it clearly. But that's okay,
> > I've removed this slide now.
> > |-And is it possible to estimate the Upsilon(3S) upper limit for
> > isobars ?
> > 
> > — Considering the large uncertainties of Y(2S) and negative Y(2S)
> > yield in isobar collisions, estimate the Upsilon(3S) upper limit won't
> > make significant physics impact. We prefer not to draw the Y(3S) upper
> > limit .
> > 
> > Best,
> > Gaohan
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:52 AM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > 
> >> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> >> 
> >> Gaohan Yang (gaohan_yang AT m.scnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for
> >> a
> >> review, please have a look:
> >> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63345
> >> 
> >> Deadline: 2023-04-24
> >> ---
> >> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> >> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Star-hp-l mailing list
> >> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l