STAR HardProbes PWG

[gaohan_yang <gaohan_yang AT m.scnu.edu.cn>]

Hi Rongrong,

Thank you for your nice comments.  I have implemented all them and uploaded a new version on the Drupal page which can be found in this link:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/ATHIC-2023/Measurement-Upsilon-production-heavy-ion-collisions-top-RHIC-energy-STAR-de

Best,

Gaohan

	gaohan_yang
gaohan_yang AT m.scnu.edu.cn

---- Replied Message ----

From Ma, Rongrong<marr AT bnl.gov> Date 4/23/2023 03:33 To gaohan_yang<gaohan_yang AT m.scnu.edu.cn> ,
STAR HardProbes PWG<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> Subject Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Gaohan Yang for ATHIC 2023 submitted for review

Hello Gaohan

In the interest of time, here are some comments for your consideration. 

General
- Unify the reference style in terms of size

s3
- suggested to be -> suggested as
- medium-induced -> Medium-induced
- feed-down -> Feed-down
- Use a different background color for "Other effects"

s4
- Trigger on elector with p_T
- Trigger on muon with p_T
- identify muon -> Identify muon
- add the azimuthal coverage to each sub-system

s5
- embedding sample -> simulation with detector effects
- though is determined with -> with its shape determined using

s6
- The results -> Results

s7
- in isobar and in Au+Au collisions -> in isobar collisions as in Au+Au collisions

s8
- Title: System -> System size
- collisions species -> collision species
- Left figure
-- remove "0-10%", "10-30%" and "30-60%" at the top of the figure since they only apply to AuAu, not Isobar
-- move "STAR Preliminary" to the right a bit
-- In the legend, add "PRL2023" to Au+Au as done in the right figure

s9
- a increading trend of Υ(1S) -> an increasing trend of Υ(1S) R_AA

s10
- at the LHC and RHIC Au+Au collision energies -> at RHIC and the LHC
- less suppression of -> less suppression for

s11
- dissociation+regeneration+CNM+elastic and inelastic scatterings -> elastic and inelastic scatterings+correlated regeneration+CNM (elastic and inelastic scatterings are the mechanisms that lead to dissociation)

s12
- are measurment -> are measured
- Sequential suppression partten is observed in Au+Au collsions -> Consistent with sequential suppression pattern
- at the same <Npart>, suppression driven by system size (<Npart>) -> at the same <Npart>: suppression driven by system size
- suppression as observed -> suppression at RHIC as observed

Best
Rongrong


> On Apr 22, 2023, at 12:01 AM, gaohan_yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>  
>  Dear conveners,
>  
>  In case you missed my updated, there is a gentle reminder. I understand you are busy with reviewing QM abstracts, but the deadline for(2023-04-24) is fast approaching. If you have any comments please feel free let me know.
>  
>  Best Wishes,
>  Gaohan
>  ---- Replied Message ----
>  From  gaohan_yang via Star-hp-l<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>  Date  4/20/2023 14:48
>  To  nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov<nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> ,
>  Barbara Trzeciak<barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
>  Cc  star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>  Subject  Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Gaohan Yang for ATHIC 2023 submitted for review
>  Hi Nihar, Yi and Barbara
>  
>  Thank you for your nice and valuable comments. I have implemented them in the updated version under the same link:
>  https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/ATHIC-2023/Measurement-Upsilon-production-heavy-ion-collisions-top-RHIC-energy-STAR-de
>  
>  Best regards,
>  Gaohan 
>  
>   	
>  gaohan_yang
>  gaohan_yang AT m.scnu.edu.cn
>  ---- Replied Message ----
>  From  Barbara Trzeciak<barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
>  Date  4/19/2023 15:36
>  To  Nihar Sahoo<nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> ,
>  STAR HardProbes PWG<star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
>  Cc  gaohan_yang<gaohan_yang AT m.scnu.edu.cn>
>  Subject  Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Gaohan Yang for ATHIC 2023 submitted for review
>  Hi Gauhan,
>  
>  thanks for the update and responses. The slides look very nice. 
>  I sign off the following comments:
>  
>  - s3: Remove dots at the end of the sentences to be consistent with the rest of the slides.
>  in the RHIC energy -> at RHIC energies
>  ccbar: Sizable CNM effect(other than NPDF) - these effects are significant for J/psi at low pT < 2 GeV/c, and I don't think we know that the effects beyond nPDFs are sizable - our data are consistent with nPDFs only as well. 
>  bbar: we don't really know how much of different CNM effects we have. 
>  Therefore, I would suggest removing CNM from the boxes and adding a bullet about  the CNM effect outside of the boxes, e.g.:
>  - Other effects: Cold Nuclear Matter (CNM), medium-induced energy loss, feed-down ...
>  For bbbar you can add a bullet in the box, e.g.: "Sequential suppression -> cleaner "QGP thermometer"
>  
>  - s5: Increase a bit the size of the text.  
>  You have twice "(dotted line)" in the 3rd bullet. 
>  
>  - s7: observed with that in Au+Au -> observed in isobar and in Au+Au
>  in 0-80% isobar collisions is observed -> in 0-80% isobar collisions
>  Plot: missing space between "Isobar" and  "\sqrt{s_NN}"
>  
>  - s8: System dependence of R_AA -> System dependence of R_AA at 200 GeV
>  I suggest adding a conclusion bullet:  No significant species dependence of the suppression at similar <N_part>
>  Plot: Add energy of the collisions
>  - s9: R_AA distribution as a function -> R_AA as a function
>  No significant pT dependence -> No significant pT dependence in Au+Au and isobar collisions
>  Add the paper reference to the Au+Au plot
>  - s10: and RHIC collision energies -> and RHIC Au+Au collision energies
>  less suppression of Υ(2S) -> less suppression of Υ(2S) at RHIC
>  - s12: remove "(Coupled Boltzmann eq is also consistent)"
>  
>  Cheers,
>  Barbara
>  
>  On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 9:00 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>  Hello Gaohan,
>  
>  Thank you for preparing this nice presentation.
>  I have minor comments below and with these implemented I sign off.
>  
>  Slide-4:
>  "Barrel Electro Magnetic Calorimeter" -> "Barrel ElectroMagnetic 
>  Calorimeter"
>  Slide-11
>  Please provide references to all these models
>  
>  Cheers
>  Nihar
>  
>  
>  
>  On 2023-04-18 23:11, gaohan_yang via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > Hi, Barbara
> >  
> >  Thank you for your valuable comments and patient response.  I have
> >  implemented them and uploaded version2 on the Drupal page which can be
> >  found in this link:
> >  https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Athic_Upsilon_Production_V2_0.pdf
> >  
> >  
> >  Please see my detailed responses inline:
> >  
> >  |-General suggestion for your consideration: you don't necessarily
> >  need to divide your presentation into Au+Au and isobar -> you can show
> >  the published results in Au+Au, then isobar and isobar compared to
> >  Au+Au, and then model and LHC comparisons at the end.
> >  — I have adjusted the order and content of the slides according to
> >  your comments. If you have any other suggestions, please let me know.
> >  |-Why in the table do you specifically show 30-60% for Au+Au and 0-80%
> >  for Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr ?
> >  I would rather show for which centrality bins that you have the
> >  <N_coll> are similar between the systems.
> >  — Yes, we compared the two systems based on the number of  similar
> >  N_parts. Maybe my table didn't explain it clearly. But that's okay,
> >  I've removed this slide now.
> >  |-And is it possible to estimate the Upsilon(3S) upper limit for
> >  isobars ?
> >  
> >  — Considering the large uncertainties of Y(2S) and negative Y(2S)
> >  yield in isobar collisions, estimate the Upsilon(3S) upper limit won't
> >  make significant physics impact. We prefer not to draw the Y(3S) upper
> >  limit .
> >  
> >  Best,
> >  Gaohan
> >  
> >  On Thu, Apr 13, 2023 at 11:52 AM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
> >  <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >  
> > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >  
> > >  Gaohan Yang (gaohan_yang AT m.scnu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for
> > >  a
> > >  review, please have a look:
> > >  https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/63345
> > >  
> > >  Deadline: 2023-04-24
> > >  ---
> > >  If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > >  webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > >  _______________________________________________
> > >  Star-hp-l mailing list
> > >  Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > >  https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > >  
> > _______________________________________________
> >  Star-hp-l mailing list
> >  Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> >  https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> >  
> _______________________________________________
>  Star-hp-l mailing list
>  Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>  https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>  _______________________________________________
>  Star-hp-l mailing list
>  Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>  https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l