STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Jaro,

Please find my comments on your nice slides.
Due to limited time, I am passing it to startalk.
Please reply to us in hp-pwg mailing list.

General: On each slide at the footer, Please add your name/conference 
name/
SLide1:
Jaroslav Bielcik for STAR collaboration -> Jaroslav Bielcik for the STAR 
collaboration

SLide3:
_"Plan 2023-2025: Au+Au 200 GeV, p+p 200 GeV, p+Au 200 GeV" -> You don't 
need here. Drop it. You are discussing this at the end Slide23

_You can just discuss the STAR detector here in general and also new 
upgrades

_Forward upgrade: 2.5 < η < 4  Heavy flavor tracker: 2014-2016. -> No 
body can see at the bottom, please bring somewhere at the top

Slide5:
Please make sure these BR numbers are correct.

Slide6:
* It is reproduced by models incorporating both radiative and 
collisional energy loss  -> "Models incorporating both radiative and 
collisional energy loss explain the data"

Slide16:
_well established probe of QGP -> well established hard probe of QGP
_"due to the transport properties of the QGP - jet quenching" -> Not 
clear, probably you mean "due to the transport properties of the QGP"
_R_CP RHIC and LHC -> R_CP at RHIC and LHC
_"Recent jet measurements address modifications to the jet structure via 
the jet fragmentation functions, jet shapes, jet mass, jet substructure" 
-> Recent jet measurements address jet modifications using jet 
substructure measurements like —jet like, jet mass, jet shape, etc.

SLide17:
_ …jet energy redistribution -> …lost jet energy redistribution in the 
medium
_ …	similar level of suppression -> …similar level of suppression, 
within uncertainty


Slide18:
* Separating vacuum shower and in-medium radiation -> This statement is 
probably Ok. But exactly we can not separate these radiations in 
heavy-ion collisions as both "vacuum + in-medium" radiation present in 
AuAu but in pp only "vacuum radiation"; in that sense we can see AuAu 
ratio is less than pp. [In case someone ask you question or comment]

Slide20:

Left figure ratio plot (R=0.2) is incorrect. So please drop this figure. 
Only keep R=0.5 please.
[We are preparing the paper and will address this.]

Large off-axis jet yield -> Better to phrase as "Excess recoil jet yield 
around pi/2"


Cheers
Nihar


On 2023-07-08 21:42, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Jaroslav Bielcik (jaroslav.bielcik AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a 
> material for
> a review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64284
>
> Deadline: 2023-07-10
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l