STAR HardProbes PWG

[Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>]

Dear Monika,

Thanks a lot for the well written proceedings. I only have some minor comments for your consideration. 

 - Abstract: I would merge the first and second paragraph together, but it is completely up to you. It is just a bit strange to me that an abstract has three paragraphs. 

 - L29, 30: why do you change the order of z_cut and beta in the bracket, in L22 it was (beta, z_cut), any particular reason? If not, it would be good to be consistent. 

 - Eq.(3): at the end, should be a period, not a comma. 

 - L42- 46: I would merge these two paragraphs. 

 - L65, 68: Fig.1 --> Figure 1     (I was taught that normally we will spell out the full word if it is in the beginning, but probably it is not that correct...)

 - L77: Fig. 3 --> Figure 3

 - L81: Fig. 4 --> Figure 4

 - L88: The statement "It was shown that selecting on different jet substructure observables and correlations between them allows us to access different regions of the Lund Plane." is a bit to me coming out of the blue. Could you please also mention this statement in the "Results" section? 

Cheers,

Yi

 

On Sat, Jul 8, 2023 at 2:49 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a 
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64281

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l