STAR HardProbes PWG

[Andrew Tamis <andrew.tamis AT yale.edu>]

Hello Isaac,

Thank you for the comments, I have uploaded a new version and will submit it.

Thank you,

Andrew

On Sun, Jul 16, 2023 at 2:34 PM Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu> wrote:

Hi Andrew,

Thanks for addressing the comments. I have a few more tiny comments below for your consideration, but I sign off.

Thanks,

Isaac

Roman text on the descriptors (e.g. the “T,jet-low” subscript; the GeV units; etc.)

Inline equations should use the "/" rather than the \frac{}{}. It looks crammed otherwise. E.g. l. 50, 79, 97, 102, Fig. 2, etc.

You don’t need the “*" for multiplication. E.g. on l. 94, 99, etc.

For Fig. 3 you can remove the first three lines of labels on the right-hand plot (p+p…; Constituent p_T…; Jet R…).

On Jul 15, 2023, at 2:36 PM, Andrew Tamis <andrew.tamis AT yale.edu> wrote:

Hello Isaac and Yi,

Thank you for the comments, I have uploaded a new version implementing them.  In updating figure 1 I also corrected a mislabelling of it as 20-30, i was showing 30 to 50 GeV in this plot.  To answer Yi's question, the two-point energy correlator is also referred to as an Energy-energy correlator, which is where EEC comes from.  EEC seems to be the most commonly used abbreviation in the literature I have cited, so I elected to use that, while keeping two-point energy correlator to show that it is a specific case of the general N-point energy correlator.

Thank you,

Andrew

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 10:29 PM Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Andrew, 

Thanks a lot for the nice proceedings, I only have some minor comments on v2 for your consideration. 

 - My stupid question: why does EEC stand for the 2-point energy correlator (the first E is for?)? Does TEC or 2EC make more sense? 

 - Title: add "by STAR"

 - L7: full pT,jet --> full jet transverse momentum 

 - L26 - L29: sounds like there are 3 regions, this sentence is a bit confusing to me.

 - L44 - L46: I would move this sentence to L38 after BEMC, otherwise the reader won't know why you mented TPC and BEMC... 

 - L48: I would move Eq. 1 before where Ei ... (add a comma in the Eq.1) 

 - L51: need to mention the meaning of i and j

 - Figure 1: is it possible to move it after L83? 

 - L61: add a reference for GEANT

 - L78 - 83: It would be good to mention the level of systematic and also point out which is the dominant one. 

 - L87: next-to-leading-log --> Next-to-Leading-Log (NLL)

 - Figure 2: Next-to-leading-log-pQCD --> NLL-pQCD 

                  Missed a period at the end. 

 - Figure 3: I would remove "15 < Jet pT < 20 GeV/c" and "30 < Jet pT < 50 GeV/c" (the big ones) since they are already on the plots (smaller black ones). 

 - L114 - L116: I think the transition region is also important, right?

 - L117: next-to-leading-log-pQCD --> NLL-pQCD 

Cheers,

Yi

On Sun, Jul 2, 2023 at 9:58 AM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Andrew Tamis (andrew.tamis AT yale.edu) has submitted a material for a review, 
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64225

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l