Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Dandan Shen for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
  • To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
  • Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Dandan Shen for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review
  • Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 04:20:32 +0000

Hi Dandan,

The poster is looking very good, and I am happy with your current phrasing of the conclusions section after the earlier discussions about pT and centrality dependence. Please see a few comments from me below. I sign off.

Thanks,
Isaac

*Either "can new" -> "can provide new" or replace it with an arrow
*This motivation seems a bit generic. I think you could add a condensed version of something similar to the "In addition to the quarkonium yield..." and "Another effect that may alter the polarization..." paragraphs in https://cds.cern.ch/record/2805485/files/PublicNote.pdf which I think give a good motivation for polarization modification studies.
*Since you mentioned it in the Intro, I think it would be helpful in the Results section to also point out that lambda_inv is roughly consistent between helicity and Collins-Soper frames (at least it looks like it by eye to me).

On Aug 28, 2023, at 3:23 PM, Ma, Rongrong via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hello Dandan

Thanks for addressing my comments. I have a few additional ones. 

General
- The symbols used to indicate bullets vary quite a bit across different parts. It would be good to make them consistent. Same for the sub-bullets. 

MOTIVATION AND INTRODUCTION
- can new insight into -> can provide insight into
- there seems an extra empty space between "feed-down" and "structure"
- move "QGP can alter the J/psi polarization" to be above "Modifications to the feed-down structure in the QGP"
- should give -> should yield

ANALYSIS PROCEDURE
- In line 1 and line 7, "and" should not be italicized
- calculate A x\epsilon using -> calculate Ax\epsilon using
- tuning of J/psi generated distribution -> tuning of J/psi polarization

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
- at RHIC energy -> at RHIC
- make "J/psi polarization vs p_T" a regular bullet, instead of a sub-bullet
- and no p_T -> with no obvious
- make "J/psi polarization vs centrality" a regular bullet, instead of a sub-bullet
- global spin alignment -> spin alignment
- Related to your outlook, STAR probably will release the measurement of J/psi spin alignment using first-order event plane with ZDC (https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/JPsiPreliminaryRequest.pdf). Do you plan to do a similar measurement or something different? If the latter, please indicate the difference, for example using TPC event plane. 

Best
Rongrong

On Aug 28, 2023, at 12:16 AM, Dandan <shendandan AT mail.sdu.edu.cn> wrote:

Hi Rongrong,

Thank for your nice comments.
Please find new version of  poster in the link: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Dandan_QM2023_v3_1.pdf



Best,
Dandan

From: "Ma, Rongrong" <marr AT bnl.gov> Date: 2023-08-26 02:14:44 To: STAR HardProbes PWG <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> Cc: "shendandan AT mail.sdu.edu.cn" <shendandan AT mail.sdu.edu.cn> Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] STAR presentation by Dandan Shen for Quark Matter 2023 submitted for review>Hello Dandan > >I was asked by the STAR management to take a look at your poster. Here are some comments for your consideration: > >General >- Sometimes you put a period at the end of a bullet, and sometimes you do not. Please pick one style and stick with it. >- In general, x-axis and y-axis titles and labels for your preliminary figures are too small. Please make them bigger. >- The resolution of the preliminary figures seems a bit low. Are you using the pdf version for the figures? > >ABSTRACT >- remove "For example, it has been hypothesized that / can be polarized due to the spin-orbit coupling between / and QGP's large angular momentum in non-central heavy-ion collisions." since this sentence is about the global spin alignment, which you do not show. >- remove ", as well as with respect to the event plane," since you do not show any results for this >- \sqrt{s_NN}= 200 GeV will be presented -> \sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV will be presented > >MOTIVATION AND INTRODUCTION >- Studying the / polarization in Heavy-ion collisions can provide additional insight into the J/psi production mechanism in HIC -> Study / polarization in heavy-ion collisions can provide new insight into the interaction between J/psi and the QGP >- reverse the order of the two sub-bullets of the first bullet >- QGP affects the polarization of / -> QGP can alter the / polarization >- Different feed-down components due to the hot medium effect. -> Modifications to the feed-down structure in the QGP >- can be analyzed -> can be extracted >- Z-axis -> z-axis (two places) >- the direction -> direction >- the bisector -> bisector >- remove the last bullet, since again you do not present any results for this. You can use this space to introduce _inv, and explain why one wants to measure it. > >STAR EXPERIMENT >- Timing resolution < 100 -> Timing - particle identification >- electron identification -> Electron identification > >ANALYSIS PROCEDURE >- extraction of raw / yields at different by fitting the di-electron invariant mass distribution -> extract raw / yields in different and bins by fitting dielectron invariant mass distributions >- calculation of × using MC simulation and correction of raw yield distribution -> calculate × using detector simulation and apply it to raw yields >- simultaneously fit the corrected yield distribution in both , extraction polarization parameters(, ) -> simultaneously fit the corrected yield distributions as a function of and to extract and >- Here, I think you should add a bullet about the iteration procedure >- Figure 1 >-- Isobar -> Ru+Ru & Zr+Zr >-- [0,80%] -> 0-80% >-- The invariant mass distributions of -+ pairs in -> Invariant mass distributions of dielectron pairs within >- Figure 2 >-- Add "Ru+Ru & Zr+Zr \sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV" >-- [0,80%] -> 0-80% >-- extracting the polarization parameters(, ) after iteration -> extracting and at the last iteration > >RESULTS AND CONCLUSION >- Title: Conclusion -> Conclusions >- Figures >-- It is visually overwhelming to use red color for all data points. I suggest to use blue solid circles for Helicity and red open circles for CS >-- text in the figure is a bit small. Please increase the size >-- I do not think you need the legend for "Sys. Unc." >-- It is weird to use "Helicity" and "Collins-Soper" in the legend since they are not what the data points represent. I suggest to put the frame name in the up-left corner in the top panel, and move information about Jpsi and centrality or pT range together and put it in the lower-right part of the top panel. By the way, you use "Helicity" and "Collins-Soper" in the left figure, but "HX" and "CS" in the right figure. Please use consistent names. >-- In the right figure, for the centrality integrated, you can remove "Centrality" and make "0-80%" bigger. >- Add two sub-bullets to the first bullet: i) Ru+Ru & Zr+Zr collisions at \sqrt{s_NN} = 20 GeV; ii) /: 0.2 < p_T < 10. GeV/c, |y| < 1 >- remove the second bullet, and make its sub-bullets as regular bullets >- vs Centrality -> vs centrality >- No significant dependence of , moving from central to peripheral events -> No significant dependence of , on centrality >- keep in tune for / global spin alignment measurement -> Outlook: measurement of / global spin alignment > >REFERNECES >- Unify the reference style, such as where to put year and wether you add parenthesis around year > >Best >Rongrong > >> On Aug 22, 2023, at 5:59 AM, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote: >> >> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members, >> >> Dandan Shen (shendandan AT mail.sdu.edu.cn) has submitted a material for a >> review, please have a look: >> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/64806 >> >> Deadline: 2023-09-03 >> --- >> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact >> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov >> _______________________________________________ >> Star-hp-l mailing list >> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov >> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l >


_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page