STAR HardProbes PWG

[suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn]

Dear Yi and Barbara,

  Thank you for your nice comments. I’ve implemented all of them, please find the updated preliminary request slides and plots here:

  https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/suyuann/PreliminaryrequestD0RAAisobar-0

Best regards,

Yuan

-----Original Messages-----
From:"Barbara Trzeciak" <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Sent Time:2023-08-28 23:19:19 (Monday)
To: "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Cc: suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn, "Yi Yang" <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Star-hp-l] Preliminary_request_D0_RAA_isobar

Hi Yuan,

I have a few comments for your consideration:

- please increase the STAR Preliminary labels a bit.

- for the published results that you show, please indicate it somehow; e.g. you can add reference to the legend

- cross section vs N_part plot (slide 12, right plot): it would be interesting to see the same but as a function of centrality.

-  T_eff vs Mass plot (slide 16, right plot): the legend looks a bit strange. I propose to change it to:

   Isobar, \sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV

   - D^0 central

   - pi, K, p central

   Au+Au, \sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV

   - D^0 central

   - D^0 20-40%

   - pi,K, p central

   - phi, lambda, sigma, omega central 

You can move part of the legend to the bottom right. 

And separate out the D0 point from the solid black points. Use different  marker and color. 

- T_kin vs beta_T plot (slide 17 right plot): in the legend move "Au+Au ...." text above the data points

Cheers,

Barbara

On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 7:51 AM Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Yuan,

Sorry for the late reply. I think it looks like the paper proposal presentation. It would be good to prepare a preliminary slide which will remove "Abstract", "Figure x", and move systematics to the front. Also you should add the physics messages for each plot. 

I have some minor comments and suggestions for your preliminary request: 

 - p.6: right plot, does N_sig mean the number of significance? If so, I think it might be confused with the number of signals. Could you please change it to N_sig/N_back or S/B or whatever your definition of significance is? 

 - p.13: the boxes in the plot looks a bit strange, you can consider just write <N_part>_AuAU = xxx and <N_part>_isobar = xxx 

 

Cheers,

Yi

On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 11:52 PM <suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:

Dear Yi and all,

Sorry for the mistake, there is an extra space in the file name.

Thanks for your response, and please find the the updated link below:

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/preliminary_D0_RAA_isobar.pdf

best regards,

Yuan

-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Yi Yang" <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>
发送时间:2023-08-03 22:12:40 (星期四)
收件人: suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn
抄送: isaac.mooney AT yale.edu, "Nihar Sahoo" <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>, "STAR HardProbes PWG" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
主题: Re: Preliminary_request_D0_RAA_isobar

Dear Yuan,

Of course, but I can't open your preliminary file. Could you please check the link? 

Cheers,

Yi

On Wed, Aug 2, 2023 at 11:34 AM <suyuann AT mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:

Dear convenors,

 Thank you for taking the time. I will be attending the pre-QM meeting, so I would like to know if I can label 'STAR Preliminary' for the isobar D0 R_AA results shown on PWGC review?

 Please find the presentation for the PWGC preview on 05/12/2023 in the link below:

  https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/PWGC_D0_RAA_isobar_20230512_YuanSu_0.pdf

   and we have implemented PWGC preview comments：

   https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/suyuann/RepliestoPWGCpreviewD0RAAisobar

 Here shows the figures with 'STAR Preliminary':

   https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/preliminary%20_D0_RAA_isobar.pdf

 Thank you for considering our Preliminary request.

best regards,

Yuan

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l