STAR HardProbes PWG

[Tristan Protzman <tlp220 AT lehigh.edu>]

Hi All,

Given the discussion of the result I'm seeing possibly having a sizable 
contribution from non-flow effects, I have been asked to update the 
preliminary figure to reflect this.  I propose calling the measurement 
v_{2}^{unsubtracted}, as v_{2}^{obs] is already used to describe the v2 
obtained before correcting for the event plane resolution.  I have updated 
the figures and preliminary figure request to reflect this. 

Please let me know if this is acceptable, or if there is other labeling you 
would prefer I use.

Cheers,
Tristan 

> On Aug 30, 2023, at 10:47, Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Tristan,
> 
> Thanks a lot for the preliminary requests. I have some minor comments for 
> your consideration. 
>  - p9: I would add "average background density" in front of pho is 0. 
>  - I think we agreed (from the discussion between Rongrong and Rosi) that 
> we will use v2^obs instead of v2 in the result. Could you please change it 
> and update the plots on your poster? 
> 
> Cheers,
> Yi
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 11:22 PM Tristan Protzman via Star-hp-l 
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I have realized the slides I presented at last Thursday's meeting for the 
> preliminary figure request were never distributed properly.  They can be 
> found here:
> 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/preliminary_figure_request_OO_v2.pdf
> 
> I have added a slide showing a comparison to a quick check I added at low 
> pt track v2 compared to results by Shengli Huang who has done a more 
> detailed study of flow measurements in O+O.  I believe the comparison shows 
> reasonable agreement between the results, averaging between the 20-40% and 
> 40-60% bins they show.  
> 
> Cheers,
> Tristan 
> _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l