STAR HardProbes PWG

[tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Nihar，
Thanks for your comments, please find my rely inline. Also the new 
version has been uploaded.

Qian Yang

On 2023-12-05 11:34, Nihar Sahoo wrote:
> Hello Qian,
>
> Please find my comments on your nice presentation slides.
>
> SLide-4:
> Not sure, what is the purpose of left figure?
> Left side theory plot is for J/psi polarization in jet where as right
> side is for inclusive J/psi polarization.
> There are different. The comparison may not be correct. Is not it?

It is not a comparison, but two examples that proved J/psi polarization 
is a key observable in p+p to understand the production mechanism.
> Besides, Left figure for x-axis J/psi FF (zh) where as the right data
> plot x-axis is Jpsi pT.
> I understand the purpose of left side figure. But I think this may be
> an incorrect comparison to motive the physics.
>
> Slide5:
> More fruitful process related to J/ψ in heavy-ion collisions: ->
> Leading J/psi production mechanisms in heavy-ion collisions:

There is also dissociation of J/psi in QGP, which is not a production 
mechanism and absent in p+p. so I think leading J/psi production 
mechanisms is not that precise.

> Coalescence -> is this "co-mover"?

Co-mover normally used to describe one of the cold nuclear effect of 
J/psi suppression.
For a pair of charm and qnti-charm bonds to a J/psi at the phase 
boundary, we normally used the word coalescence/regeneration.

> SLide6:
> "J/ψ polarization at small pT,…" -> This discussion, in this slide,
> seems out of context. I would suggest remove this or make it clear how
> this is related with Modification of J/ψ feed-down. Or Am I
> misunderstood?

I made some modification on this slides. The plots gives an example of 
feed-down contribution modification due to the QGP. While this text 
gives prediction of such modification will introduce a J/psi 
polarization.

> Slide13:
> "Particle by Particle polarization of J/ψ in QGP" -> Not clear what is
> particle-by-particle?
Yes, it is misleading. I remove this part.
> Best
> Nihar
>
>
> On 2023-12-04 21:03, tc88qy via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > Hi Yi,
> >
> >  I have uploaded the file again, Please check.
> >
> > Qian Yang
> >
> > On 2023-12-04 16:07, Yi Yang via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > Hi Qian,
> > >
> > > I removed the 66133 and we will comment on 66134
> > > (https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66134).
> > > But it seems the file in 66134 is also removed, could you please
> > > upload again? Thanks a lot.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Yi
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2023 at 10:27 PM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l
> > > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > >
> > > > Qian Yang (tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov) has submitted a material for a
> > > > review,
> > > > please have a look:
> > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66134
> > > >
> > > > Deadline: 2023-12-15
> > > > ---
> > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l