STAR HardProbes PWG

[Tanmay Pani <tanmay.pani.rutgers AT gmail.com>]

Hi Yi,

Thanks for the comment, here is the updated version:

proceeding_20.pdf (bnl.gov)

Tanmay

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:34 PM Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Tanmay,

Thanks a lot for the updated version. It looks good to me, except one minor point, inL64-66, you mentioned Fig. 2 first, so please move "Multifold  has been previously shown to compare well with the more commonly used RooUnfold [14],  as shown in Fig. 1 [9]." to L63.

Cheers,

Yi

 

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023 at 3:12 AM Tanmay Pani <tanmay.pani.rutgers AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Yi,

Thanks for the comments, here is the updated version:

proceeding_18.pdf (bnl.gov)

Tanmay

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 12:14 AM Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Tanmay,

Thanks a lot for the updated version. I have some follow-up comments: 

 - L68: It would be good if you can include the plots from your talk (p11) to demonstrate the multifold really works. I understand this is not your results, but since you emphasise that this is the first time using it in the heavy-ion collisions, I would think it is worth mentioning it. 

 - L78: you have several sources for systematic uncertainty considered, I checked your preliminary plot slides and found: 

     1. pT,jet resolution: Shifting the pT,jet result window by 3 GeV/c

     2. Multifolding non-closure: Any non closure between test and train sets from multifolding validation tests
     3. Multifolding regularization parameter: batch size
     4. Multifolding regularization parameter: number of Iterations
     5. Prior variation estimate from p+p results
     6. The uncertainties on the Central/Peripheral ratios were calculated by adding the uncertainties of central and peripheral plots in quadrature

     Can you remind me again if you add all of them in the preliminary results? Or just number of iteration? If you had all of them, please mention them in the proceedings. 

 

Cheers,

Yi

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 6:57 AM Tanmay Pani <tanmay.pani.rutgers AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Yi,

Thank you for the comments. 

Here is the new version with them implemented: 

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/proceeding_19.pdf

Tanmay

On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 4:58 PM Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Tanmay,

Thanks a lot for the proceedings. 

Could you please provide the draft with the line number so it will be easier to comment?

In the meantime, please find my comments below: 

 - Abstract: 

   - In this talk --> In this contribution  

   - I would remove "(jets constructed using ... background)", I think it is too much information for abstract

- Introduction: 

   - Any references for the generalized jet angularities definition? If so, please add them. 

   - pT, jet: it should be the jet's transverse momentum or the total jet's transverse momentum 

- Analysis details: 

  - Like you mentioned in the summary, it is the first time using multifold in heavy-ion collisions, could you please add more about it here? 

- Result and Discussion --> Results and Discussions 

   - Please add more details about the systematics, you only mentioned "various sources".

Cheers,

Yi

     

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 1:24 AM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Tanmay Pani (tp543 AT physics.rutgers.edu) has submitted a material for a 
review, please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66241

---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l