STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Barbara and Rongrong,

Thank you two for your nice comments.
Based on your comments and suggestion, I modified and restructured my 
presentation.
This is a 15min presentation; a few topics I do not add due to time 
constraint.

https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/QWG-2024/Recent-heavy-flavor-results-heavy-ion-collisions-STAR

Please have a look.

Thank you
Nihar

On 2024-02-21 03:51, Barbara Trzeciak wrote:
> Hi Nihar,
>
> Please find below a few comments from my side.
>
> - Add references to the published results
> - s2: Following up on Rongrong's comment, I would even remove the
> thermometer picture from there. We know it's a very simplified
> picture, and I don't think it's needed for this expert audience.
> By the QGP thermalization I guess you mean the QGP temperature. But
> again, one needs to be careful here, it's not only the static Debye
> screening but the dynamical processes play a role.
> And instead of the heavy flavor motivation that you have now, you can
> say here that there are different process that influence quarkonium
> production: dissociation (both static and dynamical), regeneration +
> cold nuclear matter effects
> - s9: remove "Smaller charm production rate at RHIC"
> - s10: Title: I guess you want to emphasise here isobar collision
> results - I would change the title. The Au+Au results you either show
> on the previous slides or are already old.
> And I would add here (or add a slide before this one) motivating
> studies in smaller isobar collisions, e.g.: study dependence of hot
> nuclear medium effects on medium size and energy density.
> And I would use here a simpler plot that we have, without the LHC
> data.
> - s10: "or/and charm flow in QGP at RHIC" - you mean no or small flow
> ?
> - s11: I would suggest adding the J/psi polarization in isobar
> collisions. If you don't have time, I think it might be more
> interesting in this workshop than the rho00 result.
> - s12: suppression in heavy-ion collisions- > sequential suppression
> in heavy-ion collisions at RHIC
> - s12: remove "Confirms QGP thermalization and Debye screening in
> QGP", I suggest "QGP thermal properties"
> - I'm not sure what you want to say with the second bullet, it's quite
> generic statement
>
> Cheers,
> Barbara
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 10:19 PM Ma, Rongrong via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Hello Nihar
> >
> > Thanks for updating your slides. I have few more comments for your
> > consideration:
> >
> > Slide 1: change the title to "Recent quarkonium results in ..."
> >
> > Slide 2:
> > - here you show the thermometer picture and mention " Debye
> > screening". However, you do not really explain what they are. The
> > second bullet reads more like an open HF introduction.
> > - Given the realization of imaginary part of the potential, I think
> > it is better to say dissociation in general, which includes both
> > static ("Debye screening") and dynamic processes. At least, you
> > should mention dynamical dissociation along with Debye screening.
> > - Throughout the presentation, you mention a few times about "QGP
> > thermalization". Could you elaborate how one connects quarkonium
> > suppression with QGP thermalization?
> > - For Nasim's talk, I think it is better to be titled "quarkonia in
> > p+p"
> > - I think QGP usually stands for Quark-Gluon Plasma
> >
> > Slide 3:
> > - since you do not show any open HF results, I do not think you need
> > the HFT picture
> > - Forward Silicon Track -> FST
> > - Forward EMCal and HCal -> FCS
> >
> > Slide 8
> > - This slide reads like an introduction slide for quarkonia, which
> > should be moved to slide 2?
> > - charm quark dissociation -> quarkonia dissociation
> >
> > Slide 9: I feel this slide should go together with slide 4 which
> > also discusses about energy dependence
> >
> > Slide 10: it is not clear what you want to say about the left
> > figure. The energy dependence has been discussed earlier. If you
> > want to focus on the system size dependence, I have a version of the
> > figure with only 200 GeV collision systems:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/Jpsi_Isobar_AuAu.pdf.
> > Also it is probably better to split this slide into two.
> >
> > Slide 11: our vector meson spin alignment paper concluded that the
> > QGP's global angular momentum, as observed in Lambda polarization,
> > actually contributes very little to the observed vector meson spin
> > alignment. One possible origin is the strong force field, which
> > applies to phi meson and should also apply to Jpsi. This is a main
> > motivation to measure Jpsi spin alignment, I think.
> >
> > Best
> > Rongrong
> >
> > On Feb 17, 2024, at 1:50 PM, Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello Rongrong,
> >
> > Yes, you are correct. I was diverted a bit from the theme of this
> > workshop.
> > Ok, I corrected those with a discussion of J/psi RAA and v2 from
> > Isobar.
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/QWG-2024/Recent-heavy-flavor-results-heavy-ion-collisions-STAR
> > Please have a look.
> >
> > Thank you
> > Nihar
> >
> > On 2024-02-16 22:14, Ma, Rongrong wrote:
> > Hello Nihar
> > The invitation is intended for presenting recent quarkonium results
> > in
> > heavy-ion collisions at STAR since it is a quarkonium workshop. So,
> > I
> > think it is probably not so relevant to present open HF results
> > (slides 9-11). Instead, you can consider talking about Jpsi and
> > Upsilon Raa, Jpsi v2, Jpsi polarization in Isobar, for example.
> > Thanks.
> > Best
> > Rongrong
> > On Feb 14, 2024, at 5:33 AM, Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
> > <Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> > Hello HP-pwg,
> > This is an invited talk from startalk to present at QWG2024 at
> > Mohali, India, on "Recent heavy flavor results in heavy ion
> > collisions at STAR".
> > It would be great to have comment/feedback from hp-pwg. Please have
> > a look.
> > Thank you
> > Nihar
> > On 2024-02-14 15:57, webmaster--- via Star-talks-l wrote:
> > Dear star-talks-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > Nihar Sahoo (nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov) has submitted a material for a
> > review,
> > please have a look:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/66782
> > Deadline: 2024-02-26
> > ---
> > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-talks-l mailing list
> > Star-talks-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-talks-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>
>  _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l