STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Veronica,

I don’t have any comments on your nice presentation slides.
For a record, I sign off.

Thank you
Nihar


On 2024-04-04 12:43, Veronika Prozorova wrote:
> Dear conveners,
> Please let me know if you have any additional comments or suggestions
> regarding my presentation.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Veronika
>
>                  [1]
>                 Virus-free.www.avast.com [1]
>
> вт, 2 апр. 2024 г. в 22:16, Veronika Prozorova
> <v.d.prozorova AT gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi Yi, Isaac,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your comments. I have implemented most of
> > them. I have also implemented the comments I got today after the
> > rehearsal.  Please, take a look at the new version
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DIS2024_ver4.pdf
> >
> > Below are my answers to some of your comments. Let me know if you
> > have any further suggestions.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Veronika
> >
> > Yi:
> >
> > * Unfortunately, I do not have time to include cross-section and
> > polarization results (at today's rehearsal I run out of the time
> > limit)
> > * I decided to keep the last two quarkonium slides in order
> > 1)Upsilon 2)psi(2s) as I want to tell mention first the upsilon
> > sequential suppression that was already observed in AuAu and then go
> > to the new results for psi(2s)
> >
> > Isaac: It was decided to remove some bullets in order to not confuse
> > people. I also kept the right plot on page 11, because I forgot to
> > add the bullet discussing the AuAu results. This is now changed.
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > [1]
> > Virus-free.www.avast.com [1]
> >
> > пн, 1 апр. 2024 г. в 21:15, Mooney, Isaac
> > <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>:
> >
> > Hi Veronika,
> >
> > I have some small comments on your nice slides. Please see below.
> > With these addressed, I sign off.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Isaac
> >
> > 8. You give some outlook at the beginning of this slide, but it
> > isn't picked back up in the concluding bullets for the slide after
> > we've seen the results. You could add to the last bullet a point on
> > what this says about the energy density dependence for example.
> > Also, I would say "similar suppression in isobar and Au+Au
> > collisions despite different <Npart> at a given centrality" (this
> > seems especially worth highlighting given that on s. 12 we conclude
> > that the suppression is "driven by collision energy density").
> >
> > 10. Bullets two and three seem like they can be combined (the third
> > is a bit redundant currently). And I'm not sure what you mean in
> > bullet 4 by "theoretical model calculations". Do you mean models
> > e.g. an update/retune of Pythia? Or do you mean a first principles
> > calculation? Or something else?
> >
> > 11. Since you're not talking about the AuAu data on this slide, I'm
> > not sure why you have the plot on the right included as well. It
> > seems like it would lead to more distraction than anything else,
> > especially since the colors of the makers change going from left to
> > right for the same data.
> >
> > In general, the slides in about the first half of the talk are
> > fairly busy. I would recommend animating in some transitions as
> > you're going through each one rather than having all the text shown
> > all at once.
> >
> > On Mar 31, 2024, at 17:57, Yi Yang via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Veronika,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the updated version. I have some very minor
> > comments on ver 3 for your consideration.
> > - p2: You have plenty of room, so you can use "heavy flavor" and
> > "heavy flavor electron" instead of "HF" and "HFE" here.
> > - Suggestion: I would change the order in quarkonium part:
> > 1. J/psi with jet in p+p  (this is for production mechanism,
> > it would be good to mention the cross section and polarization
> > results if you have time).
> >
> > 2. J/psi RpA in p+A
> > 3. J/psi RAA in different energy and sizes
> >
> > 4. J/psi v2 in isobar
> > 5. Psi(2S) RAA in isobar
> > 6. Upsilon RAA in isobar
> > In this order, you will cover all chromionium first, then talk about
> > bottomonium, but it is up to you, you probably have a thought of
> > presenting the results.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Yi
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 11:36 PM Veronika Prozorova
> > <v.d.prozorova AT gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Yi,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your comments! I tried to implement most of
> > them. Please, let me know if you have any further comments.
> >
> > Comments:
> > Upsilon result in Au+Au 200 GeV - I decided to put it to backup
> > slides
> >
> > Elliptic flow (v2) and RAA/RCP - This is planned to be explained a
> > bit later during the presentation (There are definitions on the next
> > slides).
> >
> > The updated version of the presentation can be found here:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DIS2024_ver3.pdf
> >
> > Best wishes,
> > Veronika
> >
> > ср, 27 мар. 2024 г. в 06:35, Yi Yang
> > <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi Veronika,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the nice slides. I have some suggestions/comments
> > on version 2.
> > - General:
> > - the topic is "Recent heavy-flavor measurements from STAR",
> > but you showed many published results on heavy-flavor electrons. Two
> > nature categories should be "Open Heavy Flavor" (heavy-flavor
> > electrons results are part of it) and "Quarkonia".
> > - You can consider also include "D0 production in isobar"
> > (Preliminary) in open heavy flavor part
> > - CNN from Jpsi pAu 200 GeV is a bit old (2022), but you can
> > add Ziyue's preliminary result (dielectron channel) in that part
> > - I would suggest also add Upsilon result in Au+Au 200 GeV
> > (published last year)
> > - Regarding the J/psi (and HFE, also) elliptic flow, I am not
> > sure how important to the audiences, I would change to J/psi
> > polarization in isobar (or J/psi RAA in isobar), or Jpsi with jet in
> > pp (also old), but something more related to the production
> > mechanism.
> > - Psi(2S) in isobar is also a very important result from RHIC.
> >
> > - Collision energy dependency of J/psi RAA is also important
> > since you are mentioning many RAA results.
> >
> > - p3: It would be good to add the eta coverages for each sub
> > detector
> > - p4: Before this slide, it would be good to have a page to talk
> > about what is the current understanding of heavy flavors,
> > production, polariation, and what is QGP (you kind of directly jump
> > to QGP, it might be too fast for some audiences.)
> > - p4: Elliptic flow (v2) and RAA/RCP probably are not clear to some
> > audiences.
> > - p8: is this n = 8.99 +/- 0.26 important? What does this mean (I
> > probably forgot it)?
> > - p14: I would also show Upsilon in Au+Au 200 GeV (published)
> > results for comparison here.
> >
> > I understand you have a short talk, but it would be good to show
> > more "new" results (it is okay to have some old ones) in the
> > conference.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Yi
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2024 at 5:28 PM Veronika Prozorova via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Yuanjing,
> >
> > Thank you very much for your valuable feedback! An updated version
> > can be found here:
> > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/DIS2024_ver2.pdf
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Veronika
> >
> > пн, 25 мар. 2024 г. в 22:12, Yuanjing Ji via Star-hp-l
> > <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>:
> > Hi Veronika,
> >
> > Nice slides!
> >
> > For slide 6-7 reference: the paper has been published on PLB:
> > Phys.Lett.B 844 (2023) 138071 (also in slide 2). And for the figure,
> >
> > could you use the final published version:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/NPEv2_27_54_model_0.pdf
> > (the only difference is the tiny changes on the style).
> >
> > Also in slide 6-7, we should be careful here when talking about 27
> > GeV
> > heavy flavor electron v2 since uncertainties are large thus hard to
> > make
> > solid conclusion. So probably
> > "𝑣2 is consistent with 0" -> "𝑣2 is consistent with 0 within
> > uncertainties"
> > "Deviation of c quarks from local thermal equilibrium?" -> "Hints of
> >
> > deviation of c quarks from local thermal equilibrium? "
> >
> > Best
> > Yuanjing
> >
> > On 2024-03-24 06:29, webmaster--- via Star-hp-l wrote:
> > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > >
> > > Veronika Prozorova (v.d.prozorova AT gmail.com) has submitted a
> > material
> > > for a
> > > review, please have a look:
> > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/67365 [2]
> > >
> > > Deadline: 2024-04-08
> > > ---
> > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l [3]
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>  _______________________________________________
> Star-hp-l mailing list
> Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&amp;utm_source=link&amp;utm_campaign=sig-email&amp;utm_content=webmail__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!BLf2dNDfkXu4UGq_M0MYHSUwJdf8W0GFlCysFSgM1BUi4bfgtNQC3SeukaccPLo8YWNJm9DP65FuVx7bHk-MEeAC5301$
> [2] https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/67365
> [3] https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l