STAR HardProbes PWG

[Gabe Dale-Gau <gdaleg2 AT uic.edu>]

Hi Isaac,

Thanks for the comments. I implemented a few changes as suggested and updated the submission page. I have individual responses to your comments below.

Thanks,

Gabe

3. I find the structure of this sentence to be a bit awkward, and would instead write "This enhancement is attributed to strong hydrodynamic flow and parton recombination in the Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP)." but you're welcome to keep it as is if you prefer.

 

Rephrased as suggested.

 

11. I find the word "alongside" odd in this context. How about "we employ jet-track correlations using identified particles to measure..."

 

This phrasing is intentional to allude to the fact that both the PID and Jet-Track correlation methods used are known methods that I use one at a time, not some hybrid mixing of the two. I hesitate to say about "we employ jet-track correlations using identified particles” because I feel like this implies that PID is performed before Jet track correlation, when in reality for this measurement, jet track correlation is performed before PID, and then PID is applied as an ensemble average measurement on the resulting distributions. I could simply change “alongside” to “and” if the word itself is confusing, but I would like to keep the sentence structure so that the two methods are referred to individually. Changed the phrasing to "and" for now, but I am willing to edit further if you would like.

 

14. The abstract ends a bit abruptly. It would be good to finish with some kind of summary or outlook for the application of your result to our broader understanding of the physics. Sooraj's abstract has a good instance of this if you want to see an example of what I mean.

 

Added “The in-jet baryon-to-meson ratios are compared between Au+Au and p+p to examine what effect the presence of QGP has on the hadronization process in jets.” To highlight the physics purpose behind the measurement without overtly stating conclusions. Let me know how this sounds to you.

 

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 3:57 PM Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu> wrote:

Hi Gabe,

The abstract looks very nice. I have a few comments below.

Thanks,

Isaac

3. I find the structure of this sentence to be a bit awkward, and would instead write "This enhancement is attributed to strong hydrodynamic flow and parton recombination in the Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP)." but you're welcome to keep it as is if you prefer.

11. I find the word "alongside" odd in this context. How about "we employ jet-track correlations using identified particles to measure..."

14. The abstract ends a bit abruptly. It would be good to finish with some kind of summary or outlook for the application of your result to our broader understanding of the physics. Sooraj's abstract has a good instance of this if you want to see an example of what I mean.

On May 13, 2024, at 11:00, Yi Yang via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi Gabe,

Thanks a lot! I don't have any further comments on it.

Cheers,

Yi

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:57 PM Gabe Dale-Gau <gdaleg2 AT uic.edu> wrote:

Dear Yi,

Thank you for these comments. I have updated the abstract accordingly.

Best,

Gabe

On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 2:13 AM Yi Yang <yiyang0429 AT gmail.com> wrote:

Dear Gabe,

Thanks a lot for the nice abstract. I only have two very minor comments for your consideration. 

 - Add your affiliation under your name. 

 - L4: QGP --> Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP)

 

Cheers,

Yi

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 10:14 PM Gabe Dale-Gau via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear HP-conveners,

I would like to highlight the final sentence of this abstract, " These in-jet ratios are studied as a function of jet radii and jet constituent pT selecitons. ", to point out the difference between what I am submitting this year and what I presented last year. This year, with a more developed method for correlated background removal, I plan to present results for constituent pT > 2.0 GeV/c, and using the increase in statistics that comes along with this jet sample, I plan to present a radial study of the p/pi ratios as well.

Thanks,

Gabe

On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 8:40 AM webmaster--- via Star-hp-l <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Gabriel Dale-Gau (gdaleg2 AT uic.edu) has submitted a material for a review, 
please have a look:
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Fdrupal.star.bnl.gov%2FSTAR%2Fnode%2F67729&data=05%7C02%7Cgdaleg2%40groute.uic.edu%7C7994e78ced9441b34bd208dc70f6cad7%7Ce202cd477a564baa99e3e3b71a7c77dd%7C0%7C0%7C638509452512812244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=pUyCAXs0eaWYL5dc25FeYnK7TayfDrqCuJBUXkJrI3Y%3D&reserved=0

Deadline: 2024-05-25
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact 
webmaster@https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="http%3A%2F%2Fwww.star.bnl.gov%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cgdaleg2%40groute.uic.edu%7C7994e78ced9441b34bd208dc70f6cad7%7Ce202cd477a564baa99e3e3b71a7c77dd%7C0%7C0%7C638509452512812244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rT6fiLYABEMljjLrkEgfeiI1152f6Czn5aFkv1OZ8%2Bg%3D&reserved=0
_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="https%3A%2F%2Flists.bnl.gov%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fstar-hp-l&data=05%7C02%7Cgdaleg2%40groute.uic.edu%7C7994e78ced9441b34bd208dc70f6cad7%7Ce202cd477a564baa99e3e3b71a7c77dd%7C0%7C0%7C638509452512812244%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rkqqz5disxfxHf8ApfrsMgDJ%2BfCpzcS%2F6yCWzT7tKiU%3D&reserved=0

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l

_______________________________________________
Star-hp-l mailing list
Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l