STAR HardProbes PWG

[Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Hello Rongrong, Yi , and Isaac,

Thank you for your constructive comments.

We have worked on your comments. Please find our responses at one place:
(Rongrong, Yi, and Isaac's comments are in order)
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/PWGComments_Acoplanarity_June16.pdf

In this revised paper draft, Supplement material is included.
Revised paper draft 
(v2):https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/AcoplanarityPaper_v2.pdf
Revised AN v2: 
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/AcoplanarityAanalysisNote_V2_0.pdf

We request HP-pwg converners to help us forming GPC.

Best
Nihar for PAs( Derek, Saskia, Peter)



On 2024-05-06 12:55, Yi Yang wrote:
> Hi Nihar,
>
> Thanks a lot for the well-written draft and analysis note.
> I agree with Rongrong's comments, so won't repeat here. I have some
> minor ones for your consideration.
>
> Paper draft:
>   - L36 - 38: the hyphens look a bit strange to me, it should look
> like the one in L26.  (similar for L314 and 315)
>   - L41: high energy --> high-energy
>   - L58: pT, jet > 30 GeV/c
>   - L59: R=0.3 --> R = 0.3
>   - L116: Gev --> GeV
>   - Eq.(1) and (2): it should be d^2 N_jet and d^2 sigma
>   - L156: sqrt(s_NN)=200 GeV --> sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV
>   - Figure 1: I would suggest to put the information in the right
> panel to the left panel as well, just in case someone cut the left
> panel only and there is no information on that.
>   - L229: What does "TBD" mean here? Will this affect the final
> physics conclusion?
>   - L245: Fig.2 --> Figure 2
>
> Question: (I probably asked it earlier) you show different behavior
> for R = 0.2 and 0.5, does it make sense to try other R numbers to see
> the actual R-dependence?
>
> Analysis note:
>   - L172: Figure 23 --> Figure 9?
>   - Question: you are using PYTHIA-8 in the embedding/simulation, but
> you used PYTHIA-6 for the comparison in the result. Why not use the
> same version of PYTHIA?
>   -  Don't you have the systematics from the unfolding iteration?
>   - Figure 23: It clearly shows the closure is not good between 2.5
> and 3, and you are using log in the ratio. Any systematics associated
> with it?
>   - L403, 404: there are "TBA"s, what does that mean?
>   - L435: The uncertainty on dPhi weights is "TBD"?
>   - Figure 26: do you have a similar plot for R = 0.2? What do the two
> "light blue" lines mean here?
>
> Cheers,
> Yi
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:16 AM Nihar Sahoo via Star-hp-l
> <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Hello HP-pwg,
> >
> > We have finalized STAR gamma+jet and pi0+jet acoplanarity paper
> > draft.
> > Paper draft, analysis Note, and paper webpage can be found below.
> > Please send your comment and feedback.
> > We request to form GPC.
> >
> > Paper draft:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/AcoplanarityPaper_v1.pdf
> > Analysis Note:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/AcoplanarityAanalysisNote_V0_0.pdf
> > Paper webpage:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/blog/nihar/Paper-webpage-Measurement-direct-photonjet-and-pi0jet-azimuthal-correlation-AuAu-and-pp-c
> > Thank you
> > PAs (Nihar, Derek, Saskia, and Peter)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Star-hp-l mailing list
> > Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-hp-l