STAR HardProbes PWG

[jeongmyung <jeongmyung AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>]

Dear Barbara,

Hello Barbara, thank you for the comments.
Most of your comments were applied to my new version. Please find my new 
version (Jeongmyung_2024_HP_Poster_v4.pdf).

Also,

> > - What do you mean by "Mimic of previous measurements" in the green 
> > box ?

since we mainly follow the STAR h+jet paper, most of our analysis chains 
were motivated by this paper. The meaning of ‘mimic’ is that we have 
implemented previous semi-inclusive recoil jet p_{T,jet} measurements 
with our simulated data set. It would be a good starting point before we 
build the new 2D measurement framework (p_{T,jet}, M_{jet}).
I added ‘h+jet, STAR’ at the ‘green box’ in the flow chart table.


Thank you,
Jeongmyung


2024-09-21 05:18에 Barbara Trzeciak이(가) 쓴 내용:
> HI Jeongmyung,
>
> Nice poster. Please find below my comments.
>
> Abstract
> - low pT,jet range -> low pT,jet values
> - sNN = 200 GeV Au+Au collision background ->  Au+Au collision
> background at sNN = 200 GeV
>
> Introduction
> - I would remove "(pT,jet < 5 GeV/c)" - even at a bit higher pT it's
> challenging in central collisions
>
> - "9 < pT,trigger <30 (GeV/c)" - is this the trigger range you're
> using, or is it just from the paper ? If you follow this selection, I
> suggest to rather put this information to the analysis details
> - I think you could make the introduction more compact and in this way
> focus more on the describing the analysis details in the following
> section
>
> Analysis details
> - What do you mean by "Mimic of previous measurements" in the green
> box ?
> - rho estimation -> background, rho, estimation
> - Correction of smearing -> Correction for smearing
> By smearing you mean the background fluctuations ? It's not clear
>
> Results I, Corrected recoil jet yield spectra
> - Suggest to make the text in color in the gray boxes bold, otherwise
> it might be not well visible
> - I'm missing explanation what are different "ME +"  - if you make
> introduction more compact, you could add this information to the
> analysis details
> - It's almost impossible to read legend of the rho plot
>
> Results II
> - It's imp;possible to see the legend of the right plot
>
> Conclusions
> - Text is quite small, would be good to increase size of the text
> - 200 GeV Au+Au data -> Au+Au data at \sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV
>
> Cheers,
> Barbara
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 3:44 AM Yi Yang
> <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw> wrote:
>
> > Dear Jeongmyung,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the updated version and reply.
> > I don't have any further comments on it.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Yi
> >
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > Yi Yang, Research Fellow
> > Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica
> > E-Mail: yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw
> > Tel: +886-2-2789-6709
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >
> > -----Original message-----
> > From:jeongmyung <jeongmyung AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> > To:star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > Cc:Yi Yang <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw>
> > Date:Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:33:23
> > Subject:Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jeongmyung Kang for
> > HP2024 submitted for review
> >
> > Dear Yi,
> >
> > Thank you for the comments!
> > Your comment regarding the abstract was applied. Please find my new
> > version (Jeongmyung_2024_HP_poster_v3.pdf).
> >
> > > > - Could you please remind me that if the PYTHIA simulation
> > passed the
> > > > GEANT simulation?
> >
> > - No. Since this study strongly focuses on the correction of the
> > heavy-ion background effects, only 200 GeV PYTHIA events with hard
> > QCD
> > and toy thermal background have been utilized. There was no
> > consideration regarding instrumental effects in this study.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Jeongmyung
> >
> > 2024-09-19 17:38에 Yi Yang이(가) 쓴 내용:
> > > Dear Jeongmyung,
> > >
> > > Thanks a lot for the nice poster, and sorry for missing this
> > before.
> > > I only have two minor comments for your consideration.
> > > - Abstract: I would remove ", however, ".
> > > - Could you please remind me that if the PYTHIA simulation passed
> > the
> > > GEANT simulation? If so, it would be great to mention it and have
> > a
> > > short introduction for STAR. Otherwise, I think the only
> > connection to
> > > STAR is in the "title", "flow chart", "collision energy", and
> > "future
> > > plan". And this study actually can be a more generic one.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Yi
> > >
> > >
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > Yi Yang, Research Fellow
> > > Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica
> > > E-Mail: yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw
> > > Tel: +886-2-2789-6709
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >
> > > -----Original message-----
> > > From:jeongmyung <jeongmyung AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> > > To:star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> > > Cc:Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
> > > Date:Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:04:25
> > > Subject:Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jeongmyung Kang
> > for
> > > HP2024 submitted for review
> > >
> > > Dear Nihar,
> > >
> > > Hello, thank you for the comments.
> > > I applied most of your comments in the new version. Please find my
> > new
> > > version (Jeongmyung_2024_HP_poster_v2.pdf)
> > >
> > > Also, I keep thinking about your comment regarding 'Flow chart'.
> > >
> > > > _Flow chart: -> The  need of this flow chart is not clear at
> > this
> > > stage. I think you can make a flow chart of your analysis
> > procedure.
> > > One of the main purposes of this poster is to show the status of
> > the
> > > on-going analysis, and at this stage, I believe it is better to
> > keep
> > > the
> > > current flow chart.
> > >
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Jeongmyung
> > >
> > > 2024-09-15 16:12에 Nihar Sahoo이(가) 쓴 내용:
> > > > Hello Jeongmyung,
> > > >
> > > > Please find my comments on your nice poster.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Introduction:
> > > >
> > > > _Particularly dominant contribution in low pT,jet region -> you
> > need
> > > > to mention what Pt,jet range you are indicating.  Low pT,jet < 5
> > GeV/c
> > > > is that you mean.
> > > > _Challenges in central heavy-ion collisions -> Challenges in
> > heavy-ion
> > > > collisions
> > > > _ E.g. -> e. g.
> > > > _pT spectra down to very low pT,jet -> Please mention what is
> > that
> > > > "very low pT" ?
> > > > _pT,trigger -> need to define
> > > >
> > > > _Searching parton virtuality evolution in central heavy- ion
> > > > collisions -> Studying parton virtuality evolution in central
> > heavy-
> > > > ion collisions
> > > > _ virtuality evolution -> it would be better to mention what is
> > > > "virtuality evolution"?
> > > > _ Please mention Why do we need to study virtuality evolution in
> > > > heavy-ion collisions?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Analysis Details:
> > > > _Flow chart: -> The  need of this flow chart is not clear at this
> > > > stage. I think you can make a flow chart of your analysis
> > procedure.
> > > > _"Data set" -> As you are not using any data, so you just mention
> > > > "Simulated events"
> > > > _200 GeV pp collisions -> You need to mention what type of event
> > > > sample you have generated. Is it non-trigger (no-Bias) or
> > triggered
> > > > events for this study ( like high pT hadron, gamma, pi0 trigger
> > > > events)
> > > > _"Thermal background" -> Need to explain what is thermal
> > background?
> > > > Results:
> > > >
> > > > _ You need to mention what are SE and ME ?
> > > > _ In response matrices, you have not mentioned, what effect you
> > have
> > > > implanted to create this response matrix? Like detector effects,
> > > > and/or heavy-ion background fluctuations effect.
> > > > _ Corrected recoil jet yield spectra -> You need to mention what
> > > > correction you are implementing (see above comment).
> > > >
> > > > In conclusion:
> > > > You need to mention also outlook of this study.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Nihar
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2024-09-14 09:59, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
> > > > > Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
> > > > >
> > > > > Jeongmyung Kang (jeongmyung.kang AT gmail.com) has submitted a
> > material
> > > > > for a
> > > > > review, please have a look:
> > > > > https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/68922
> > > > >
> > > > > Deadline: 2024-09-22
> > > > > ---
> > > > > If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> > > > > webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov