STAR HardProbes PWG

["Yi Yang" <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw>]

Dear Jeongmyung,

Thanks a lot for implementing our comments, I have pushed it to STAR talk. 
Enjoy the conference!

Cheers,
Yi


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Yi Yang, Research Fellow
Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica 
E-Mail: yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw 
Tel: +886-2-2789-6709
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

-----Original message-----
From:jeongmyung <jeongmyung AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
To:star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Cc:Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com>
Date:Sat, 21 Sep 2024 19:38:23
Subject:Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jeongmyung Kang for HP2024 
submitted for review

Dear Barbara,

Hello Barbara, thank you for the comments.
Most of your comments were applied to my new version. Please find my new 
version (Jeongmyung_2024_HP_Poster_v4.pdf).

Also,

>> - What do you mean by "Mimic of previous measurements" in the green 
>> box ?

since we mainly follow the STAR h+jet paper, most of our analysis chains 
were motivated by this paper. The meaning of ‘mimic’ is that we have 
implemented previous semi-inclusive recoil jet p_{T,jet} measurements 
with our simulated data set. It would be a good starting point before we 
build the new 2D measurement framework (p_{T,jet}, M_{jet}).
I added ‘h+jet, STAR’ at the ‘green box’ in the flow chart table.


Thank you,
Jeongmyung


2024-09-21 05:18에 Barbara Trzeciak이(가) 쓴 내용:
> HI Jeongmyung,
> 
> Nice poster. Please find below my comments.
> 
> Abstract
> - low pT,jet range -> low pT,jet values
> - sNN = 200 GeV Au+Au collision background ->  Au+Au collision
> background at sNN = 200 GeV
> 
> Introduction
> - I would remove "(pT,jet < 5 GeV/c)" - even at a bit higher pT it's
> challenging in central collisions
> 
> - "9 < pT,trigger <30 (GeV/c)" - is this the trigger range you're
> using, or is it just from the paper ? If you follow this selection, I
> suggest to rather put this information to the analysis details
> - I think you could make the introduction more compact and in this way
> focus more on the describing the analysis details in the following
> section
> 
> Analysis details
> - What do you mean by "Mimic of previous measurements" in the green
> box ?
> - rho estimation -> background, rho, estimation
> - Correction of smearing -> Correction for smearing
> By smearing you mean the background fluctuations ? It's not clear
> 
> Results I, Corrected recoil jet yield spectra
> - Suggest to make the text in color in the gray boxes bold, otherwise
> it might be not well visible
> - I'm missing explanation what are different "ME +"  - if you make
> introduction more compact, you could add this information to the
> analysis details
> - It's almost impossible to read legend of the rho plot
> 
> Results II
> - It's imp;possible to see the legend of the right plot
> 
> Conclusions
> - Text is quite small, would be good to increase size of the text
> - 200 GeV Au+Au data -> Au+Au data at \sqrt{s_NN} = 200 GeV
> 
> Cheers,
> Barbara
> 
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 3:44 AM Yi Yang
> <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw> wrote:
> 
>> Dear Jeongmyung,
>> 
>> Thanks a lot for the updated version and reply.
>> I don't have any further comments on it.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Yi
>> 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Yi Yang, Research Fellow
>> Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica
>> E-Mail: yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw
>> Tel: +886-2-2789-6709
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 
>> -----Original message-----
>> From:jeongmyung <jeongmyung AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
>> To:star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>> Cc:Yi Yang <yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw>
>> Date:Fri, 20 Sep 2024 09:33:23
>> Subject:Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jeongmyung Kang for
>> HP2024 submitted for review
>> 
>> Dear Yi,
>> 
>> Thank you for the comments!
>> Your comment regarding the abstract was applied. Please find my new
>> version (Jeongmyung_2024_HP_poster_v3.pdf).
>> 
>>>> - Could you please remind me that if the PYTHIA simulation
>> passed the
>>>> GEANT simulation?
>> 
>> - No. Since this study strongly focuses on the correction of the
>> heavy-ion background effects, only 200 GeV PYTHIA events with hard
>> QCD
>> and toy thermal background have been utilized. There was no
>> consideration regarding instrumental effects in this study.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> Jeongmyung
>> 
>> 2024-09-19 17:38에 Yi Yang이(가) 쓴 내용:
>>> Dear Jeongmyung,
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot for the nice poster, and sorry for missing this
>> before.
>>> I only have two minor comments for your consideration.
>>> - Abstract: I would remove ", however, ".
>>> - Could you please remind me that if the PYTHIA simulation passed
>> the
>>> GEANT simulation? If so, it would be great to mention it and have
>> a
>>> short introduction for STAR. Otherwise, I think the only
>> connection to
>>> STAR is in the "title", "flow chart", "collision energy", and
>> "future
>>> plan". And this study actually can be a more generic one.
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Yi
>>> 
>>> 
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> Yi Yang, Research Fellow
>>> Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica
>>> E-Mail: yiyang429 AT gate.sinica.edu.tw
>>> Tel: +886-2-2789-6709
>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 
>>> -----Original message-----
>>> From:jeongmyung <jeongmyung AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
>>> To:star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
>>> Cc:Nihar Sahoo <nihar AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
>>> Date:Mon, 16 Sep 2024 18:04:25
>>> Subject:Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Jeongmyung Kang
>> for
>>> HP2024 submitted for review
>>> 
>>> Dear Nihar,
>>> 
>>> Hello, thank you for the comments.
>>> I applied most of your comments in the new version. Please find my
>> new
>>> version (Jeongmyung_2024_HP_poster_v2.pdf)
>>> 
>>> Also, I keep thinking about your comment regarding 'Flow chart'.
>>> 
>>>> _Flow chart: -> The  need of this flow chart is not clear at
>> this
>>> stage. I think you can make a flow chart of your analysis
>> procedure.
>>> 
>>> One of the main purposes of this poster is to show the status of
>> the
>>> on-going analysis, and at this stage, I believe it is better to
>> keep
>>> the
>>> current flow chart.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Jeongmyung
>>> 
>>> 2024-09-15 16:12에 Nihar Sahoo이(가) 쓴 내용:
>>>> Hello Jeongmyung,
>>>> 
>>>> Please find my comments on your nice poster.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Introduction:
>>>> 
>>>> _Particularly dominant contribution in low pT,jet region -> you
>> need
>>>> to mention what Pt,jet range you are indicating.  Low pT,jet < 5
>> GeV/c
>>>> is that you mean.
>>>> _Challenges in central heavy-ion collisions -> Challenges in
>> heavy-ion
>>>> collisions
>>>> _ E.g. -> e. g.
>>>> _pT spectra down to very low pT,jet -> Please mention what is
>> that
>>>> "very low pT" ?
>>>> _pT,trigger -> need to define
>>>> 
>>>> _Searching parton virtuality evolution in central heavy- ion
>>>> collisions -> Studying parton virtuality evolution in central
>> heavy-
>>>> ion collisions
>>>> _ virtuality evolution -> it would be better to mention what is
>>>> "virtuality evolution"?
>>>> _ Please mention Why do we need to study virtuality evolution in
>>>> heavy-ion collisions?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Analysis Details:
>>>> _Flow chart: -> The  need of this flow chart is not clear at this
>>>> stage. I think you can make a flow chart of your analysis
>> procedure.
>>>> 
>>>> _"Data set" -> As you are not using any data, so you just mention
>>>> "Simulated events"
>>>> _200 GeV pp collisions -> You need to mention what type of event
>>>> sample you have generated. Is it non-trigger (no-Bias) or
>> triggered
>>>> events for this study ( like high pT hadron, gamma, pi0 trigger
>>>> events)
>>>> _"Thermal background" -> Need to explain what is thermal
>> background?
>>>> 
>>>> Results:
>>>> 
>>>> _ You need to mention what are SE and ME ?
>>>> _ In response matrices, you have not mentioned, what effect you
>> have
>>>> implanted to create this response matrix? Like detector effects,
>>>> and/or heavy-ion background fluctuations effect.
>>>> _ Corrected recoil jet yield spectra -> You need to mention what
>>>> correction you are implementing (see above comment).
>>>> 
>>>> In conclusion:
>>>> You need to mention also outlook of this study.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Best
>>>> Nihar
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 2024-09-14 09:59, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
>>>>> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Jeongmyung Kang (jeongmyung.kang AT gmail.com) has submitted a
>> material
>>>>> for a
>>>>> review, please have a look:
>>>>> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/68922
>>>>> 
>>>>> Deadline: 2024-09-22
>>>>> ---
>>>>> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
>>>>> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov