Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-hp-l - Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] order of slides

star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Rosi Reed <rosijreed AT lehigh.edu>
  • To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
  • Cc: Brennan Schaefer <brs521 AT lehigh.edu>
  • Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] order of slides
  • Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 08:15:50 -0400

Hi Brennan,
I agree with Barbara here - I think you need to reorder the information on the slides.  Basically, it should go:
Things you do to select events
Things you do to select tracks
What you do with the tracks
How you extract the Signal
Then the extracted signal
Technically you would then follow that with what the extracted signal means, though I think we've agreed to keep interpretation to a minimum.

In the latest version you're still missing a lot of the details of your analysis - I think you can add some of these things that you should already have on slides you've made to flesh out the content and to satisfy the requests.
Regards,
Rosi

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 7:59 AM Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Brennan,

I would say it's better to first describe how you extract the signal (dataset, selection, electron reconstruction etc.) and then show the extracted signal.

Cheers,
Barbara

On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 1:17 PM Brennan Schaefer <brs521 AT lehigh.edu> wrote:
Hi Barbara, I've adjusted the order repeatedly and I'm lost.  I don't know how to satisfy both of these:


Rosi:  The story is muddled here, the invariant mass plots are towards the end - and the analysis procedure happens prior to the signal extraction.

Barbara: the signal extraction should be after the analysis procedure


b


--
Rosi Reed
Associate Professor, Physics Department
Lehigh University
(610)758-3907
16 Memorial Drive East Office 406
Bethlehem, PA 18015
she/her/hers



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page