STAR HardProbes PWG

[Helen Caines <helen.caines AT yale.edu>]

Hi All,

Sorry to chime in late too, but I would like to echo Jana’s question on the 
rational behind merging the B/M ratios (10) in jets and the EEC abstract 
(13). 

Maybe I am missing something but I don’t see how these two topics can be 
discussed  in a 15 min talk and have a coherent uniting physics message 
across the two analyses. I understand the desire to not submit too many 
abstracts, but we also need to be clear what the overarching physics message 
of each abstract will be so the speaker can tell a good story. Some of the 
worst QM talks occur when collaborations try to merge too many analyses with 
differing focuses in one talk. 

Helen


Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 17, 2024, at 1:14 PM, Bielčíková Jana <bielcikova AT ujf.cas.cz> wrote:
> 
>  Btw, what is the rationale behind combining B/M ratios in jets (10) with 
> correlators (13)?