STAR HardProbes PWG

["Mooney, Isaac" <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>]

Hi Ondřej,

Thanks for addressing the comments. I sign off. 

-Isaac

On Nov 7, 2024, at 04:30, Ondrej.Lomicky AT seznam.cz wrote:

Hi Isaac,

thank you for your comments. I rewrote the sentences as you suggested. In addition, I modified the last sentences in both paragraphs to emphasize the connection between both analyses. 

The new version is available here: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/presentations/Quark-Matter-2025/Generalized-jet-angularity-measurements-STAR-sqrtsmathrmNN-200-GeV

Best regards,

Ondřej

---------- Původní e-mail ----------
Od: Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
Komu: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Datum: 4. 11. 2024 23:13:58
Předmět: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Ondrej Lomicky for Quark Matter 2025 submitted for review

Hi Ondřej and Tanmay,

Thanks for preparing this nice merged abstract. I have a few mostly small comments below.

Best,

Isaac

Title: add either "Au+Au collisions" or "heavy-ion collisions"

3. Reword for clarity: "Moments of the jet's transverse momentum, p_{\mathrm{T}}, profile in the \eta - \phi plane relative to the jet axis, called generalized jet angularities, are an important class of ... patterns."

8. "have been performed using inclusive jets in Pb+Pb collisions..." 

9. "using Au+Au collisions"

10. "complementary to that probed"

11. "Repeating" -> "Performing similar measurements for $D^{0}$-tagged jets..."

11. "D0-tagged" and "containing a charm quark" are somewhat redundant. Go with one or the other.

15. "fully-corrected"

17. This sentence is starting to get into an awkward middle ground between explaining some of the details of the measurements and not doing so. I would either remove this one, or explain in more detail that we can use peripheral collisions as the baseline for no-to-little medium effect on the angularities and compare to central. Or, have a few sentences explaining the salient details of the measurement including centrality, pT, radius, etc (less recommended since the abstract already seems to be a bit on the long side).

General: It seems like there is a missed opportunity to make an explicit connection between the physics we get from these two analyses together. Since inclusive jets are dominated by light quark initiators at RHIC, by pairing the inclusive and D0-jet, we have a handle on light vs. heavy quark energy loss. Instead, they're presented as two more distinct things, e.g. in the last sentence "jet quenching" on one hand, and "heavy flavor quark in-medium energy loss" on another. Of course, the calculational techniques necessary to describe each case can be somewhat distinct, but the physics parallel itself is nice.

On Oct 28, 2024, at 11:36, Ondrej.Lomicky AT seznam.cz wrote:

Hi All,

Just for the record, this is my abstract merged with Tanmay's.

Best regards,
Ondřej

---------- Původní e-mail ----------
Od: webmaster AT star.bnl.gov
Komu: Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Datum: 28. 10. 2024 16:32:43
Předmět: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Ondrej Lomicky for Quark Matter 2025 submitted for review

Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,

Ondrej Lomicky (lomicond AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a review,
please have a look:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/69764

Deadline: 2024-10-31
---
If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov