star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
- From: "Robotkova, Monika" <robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz>
- To: "star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
- Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:53:34 +0000
Hi Isaac,
Thank you for your useful comments, I've implemented them and uploaded new version on Drupal.
Best regards,
Monika
Od: star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l-request AT lists.bnl.gov> za uľivatele Mooney, Isaac <isaac.mooney AT yale.edu>
Odesláno: středa 20. listopadu 2024 22:41
Komu: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Předmět: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
Odesláno: středa 20. listopadu 2024 22:41
Komu: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov <star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
Předmět: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review
Hi Monika,
I have a few comments on your well-written slides, below.
Thanks,
Isaac
11. Later in passing you mention the motivation for Collinear Drop (s. 15), but since you give the physics motivation for Soft Drop on this slide, it would also be good to mention the motivation for Collinear Drop.
14. It would be good to specify the directionality in the second bullet -- so, "we move from non-perturbative to perturbative region by increasing Rg" or similar.
17. Rather than the transition region shifting with momentum, I would emphasize the universality of the transition region when scaled by momentum. This contains the information in your current second bullet and adds additional information as well.
19.
You mention that the data are captured by MC models and theoretical predictions, but we've seen for the EEC and similarly for rc, that models aren't simultaneously able to describe the distribution of charge information within the jets. I think this is nice to point out since it shows that pp is not a solved problem -- there is still interesting work to be done. It wouldn't need to have its own slide, but maybe a bullet point on s. 17 with a citation, and mentioned again on this slide.
For the outlook to A+A collisions, this makes it seem as if no substructure measurements have been done in A+A collisions at STAR yet, but e.g. the generalized angularities have a preliminary measurement. Of course, you don't need to include every STAR result in your talk, but would be good to make it clear that some work has been done already on this.
> On Nov 19, 2024, at 17:12, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
>
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/69940
>
> Deadline: 2024-12-02
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
I have a few comments on your well-written slides, below.
Thanks,
Isaac
11. Later in passing you mention the motivation for Collinear Drop (s. 15), but since you give the physics motivation for Soft Drop on this slide, it would also be good to mention the motivation for Collinear Drop.
14. It would be good to specify the directionality in the second bullet -- so, "we move from non-perturbative to perturbative region by increasing Rg" or similar.
17. Rather than the transition region shifting with momentum, I would emphasize the universality of the transition region when scaled by momentum. This contains the information in your current second bullet and adds additional information as well.
19.
You mention that the data are captured by MC models and theoretical predictions, but we've seen for the EEC and similarly for rc, that models aren't simultaneously able to describe the distribution of charge information within the jets. I think this is nice to point out since it shows that pp is not a solved problem -- there is still interesting work to be done. It wouldn't need to have its own slide, but maybe a bullet point on s. 17 with a citation, and mentioned again on this slide.
For the outlook to A+A collisions, this makes it seem as if no substructure measurements have been done in A+A collisions at STAR yet, but e.g. the generalized angularities have a preliminary measurement. Of course, you don't need to include every STAR result in your talk, but would be good to make it clear that some work has been done already on this.
> On Nov 19, 2024, at 17:12, webmaster AT star.bnl.gov wrote:
>
> Dear Star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov members,
>
> Monika Robotkova (robotmon AT fjfi.cvut.cz) has submitted a material for a
> review, please have a look:
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/69940
>
> Deadline: 2024-12-02
> ---
> If you have any problems with the review process, please contact
> webmaster AT www.star.bnl.gov
-
[[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review,
webmaster, 11/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review,
Mooney, Isaac, 11/20/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review,
Robotkova, Monika, 11/21/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/21/2024
- Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review, Mooney, Isaac, 11/21/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review,
Nihar Sahoo, 11/21/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review,
Robotkova, Monika, 11/21/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] STAR presentation by Monika Robotkova for Zimanyi School 2024 submitted for review,
Mooney, Isaac, 11/20/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.