star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR HardProbes PWG
List archive
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding
- From: tc88qy <tc88qy AT rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- To: star-hp-l AT lists.bnl.gov, barbara.trzeciak AT gmail.com
- Subject: Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding
- Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 18:15:57 +0800
Hello Priyanka
I am ok with these reply.
Figure 1 does not delivering physics information, I do not saw a plot with "STAR" on it before.
Probably Barbara can give comments on this and give a decision.
Qian
On 2024-11-30 21:08, "Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT)" wrote:
Dear Convenors and all,
I received the following comments on my SQM proceeding. I implemented
most of those and uploaded V5 in the same node as previous one.
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/node/68859
Please find my responses to these comments and questions.
Abstract: particle emit and the -> are emitted and on the ---> DONE
Abstract: Such correlations ... in the hadronic phase. -> this
sentence has to be rephrased in the sense of clearly stating that the
correlations can bring information about the interaction of charm
quarks with the QGP medium and of charmed hadrons in the hadronic
rescattering phase. ---> I am not sure if I can make this statement as
we don't have any theory model which can connect the findings through
femtoscopy at final state can connect the interaction at initial
stages, so kept the line unchanged
page 1: In the early ... establishment [1]. -> Heavy quarks such as
charm (c) and its charge conjugate (c-bar) are created in the early
stages of ultra-relativistic collisions of heavy ions. Therefore, they
probe all stages of the evolution of heavy-ion collisions -
Quark-Gluon Plasma (QGP), hadronization, chemical and kinetic
freeze-out. ----> DONE
page 1: remove the sentence with the big bang. It is not really
linked to the rest of the text. —-> DONE
page 1: interact with the medium -> which medium? QGP? Than clearly
state it ----> DONE
page 1: paarticular -> particular -----> DONE
page 1: Phase... [5]. -> Phase-space evolution of emission source and
final-state interactions can be both studied with such measurements in
heavy-ion collisions [5]. ------> DONE
page 2: suggest to remove the branching ratio -> Kpi. Moreover, 'and
set of topological criteria' is somehow not linked to the rest of the
sentence -> rephrase ------> DONE
page 2: Fig.1 shows the reconstructed D0 and D0-bar invariant mass
distributions using STAR data of Au+Au collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200
GeV [4]. —---> DONE
page 2: remove 'for this study' —----> DONE
Figure 1:
_) you have purity labels, but you do not discuss them at all. So
either remove them or quote them later on where you explain Eq.(2). It
is better maybe to remove them , because in these plots you show only
D0 candidates, while you refer to the purity in terms of D0-identified
hadron pairs. If in the figure you quote the D0 purity, write it
clearly in the caption and/or in the text. —--> __I mentioned
about D0 purity right above the fig 1, this comment is unclear to me_
) Add Au+Au, sqrt(s_NN) and STAR label —---> Can I put "STAR" in
the inv mass plots??
_) red curved should be added to the legend ----> Not yet
implemented_
) caption: you discuss here for the first time the LS pairs. This
should be properly addressed in the text. Moreover, it is not clear
whether the red curves are a result from the LS subtraction, or just
results from the fitting procedure. Note also that the black points
are US, but what happens is that the US background can be described
well with LS pairs. Please revise the caption and the corresponding
text to avoid confusions. —---> Modified
page 2: The computed value of the correlation function can be affected
---> DONE
page 2: identifying -> identified -------> DONE
page 3: 'to reduce contamination ... present in the system' -> this is
a bit hard to ready, if you can please rephrase to make clearer. --->
DONE
page 3: n-sigma -> you have to explain that you discuss PID here and
describe what is it. ---> Rephrased with a reference, but looking for
a better reference
page 4: Theory calculations... pairs [9]. -> Please write properly
that in the left panel the theory predictions are for a mixture of
D0-pi+ and D+-pi0 and in the right panel for D0-K+ pairs. -----> DONE
page 4: what do you mean by 'at the origin'? -----> Modified
The reviewer informed me that they intend to finalize the proceeding
by Dec 3rd but I received the comments not much earlier. So, apologize
for the last moment rush.
Please let me know if you have any questions and comments to address.
Regards,
Priyanka
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
tc88qy, 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Barbara Trzeciak, 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Barbara Trzeciak, 12/02/2024
- Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 12/03/2024
- Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding, Mooney, Isaac, 12/04/2024
- Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding, Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 12/05/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 12/03/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Barbara Trzeciak, 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Barbara Trzeciak, 12/02/2024
-
Re: [[Star-hp-l] ] URGENT review feedback on SQM proceeding,
Roy Chowdhury Priyanka (DOKT), 12/02/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.