Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

star-qaboard-l - Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA board meeting (Run-20, isobar QA) + 19.2GeV calibration TF meeting

star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov

Subject: STAR QA Board

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Frank Geurts <geurts@rice.edu>
  • To: Ashish Pandav <apandav10@gmail.com>
  • Cc: Frank Geurts via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>, Rongrong Ma via Star-pwgc-l <star-pwgc-l@lists.bnl.gov>, "Francisco, Audrey" <audrey.francisco@yale.edu>
  • Subject: Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA board meeting (Run-20, isobar QA) + 19.2GeV calibration TF meeting
  • Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:14:36 -0500

Hi Ashish,

> […] exactly are we looking for?
> I was having the opinion that it would be suggestions from conveners on
> what are the QAs to be checked, what are the vital checks for the isobar
> data


Yes, that is exactly what I would like to hear for this first discussion.

> or how do we approach the isobar QA.

I presume that to be more of a technical aspect of the QA. Certainly relevant
as the production is about the ramp up, but for a first discussion that tries
to get the PWGs fully engaged this is something that perhaps not for today’s
meeting.


-Frank





> On Sep 18, 2020, at 7:04 AM, Ashish Pandav <apandav10@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Frank,
>
> Just to confirm,
> When you say plans for offline QA of the upcoming Isobar production, what
> exactly are we looking for?
> I was having the opinion that it would be suggestions from conveners on
> what are the QAs to be checked, what are the vital checks for the isobar
> data or how do we approach the isobar QA.
>
> Kindly let me know the fine points that you need from the conveners, in
> case I got it wrong.
>
> Thanking you,
> Best regards,
> Ashish
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 7:41 PM Frank Geurts via STAR-QAboard-l
> <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Please join our weekly QA-Board meeting, Friday September 18 at noon
> (EDT). As we move from our weekly Run20 QA to a focus on upcoming offline
> QA the usual agenda topics will change accordingly. As was done last week,
> we will continue the meeting in a discussion on the Run-19 TPC calibration.
>
> As was requested during our last meeting, I would like to ask the Heavy-Ion
> PWG QA delegates to report back tomorrow on their plans for offline QA of
> the upcoming Isobar production. Please consult with your respective PWG
> conveners (cc:’d).
>
> Audrey Francisco has kindly agreed to share with us her work on gathering
> the relevant Isobar production QA for the CME focus group.
>
> The tentative agenda will be as follows:
>
> 1) Wrap-up Run 20 QA:
> - Fast Offline
> - PWG Online QA
>
> 2) Offline QA: Run -18 Isobar Production
> - Update from CME focus group - Audrey Francisco
> - Updates from PWG delegates:
> - LFSUPC : Ben Kimelman, Chenliang Jin
> - BulkCorr : Kosuke Okubo, Ashish Pandav
> - HeavyFlavor : Kaifeng Shen, Yingjie Zhou
> - JetCorr : Tong Liu, Issac Mooney
>
> 3) Run-19 Calibration Taskforce (19.6GeV)
>
>
> Details are listed below:
>
> https://bluejeans.com/563179247
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/comp/qa/pwg-qa/run-20-bes-ii-qa
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/event/2020/09/18/qa-board-meeting
>
>
> Best,
> -Frank
> _______________________________________________
> STAR-QAboard-l mailing list
> STAR-QAboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-qaboard-l





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page