STAR QA Board

[Daniel Cebra <cebra@physics.ucdavis.edu>]

Hi Gene,

   That quick 26.5 GeV FXT run on Thursday Night caught all of us by surprise. Only two runs, so I wouldn't worry very much about those. The best thing is that we got the timing set, so we are ready to make the most of future opportunities. It does finally look like CeC is making use of the ion beam, I am expecting that they will keep using is through their remaining time - I expect that to be roughly two 12 hours shots per week, then a dedicated 5 day shot at the end of the run.

   However... this is also a good heads-up that we do need to be better about keeping everyone informed.

Best, Daniel

On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 9:03 AM Van Buren, Gene via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi, QA board

This is an FYI...

I did not catch, nor was I specifically informed, that we took production fixed target data on Thursday night with runs 22154036 and 037. The consequence is that we did not reconstruct those runs in FastOffline with the correct vertex-finding parameters.

-Gene
_______________________________________________
STAR-QAboard-l mailing list
STAR-QAboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-qaboard-l