star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR QA Board
List archive
Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA variables for PWG bad run lists
- From: "Kaifeng Shen" <skfwyl@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
- To: "Rongrong Ma" <marr@bnl.gov>
- Cc: "star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov" <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA variables for PWG bad run lists
- Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:28:50 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
Hi Rongrong,
I will discuss with HF PWG about this concern, thanks.
Best regards,
Kaifeng
-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Rongrong Ma via STAR-QAboard-l" <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
发送时间:2021-12-11 01:56:41 (星期六)
收件人: "star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov" <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
抄送:
主题: [STAR-QAboard] QA variables for PWG bad run lists
Dear AllWith the bad run list for centrality calibration close to be finalized, now is a good time to add the QA variables for PWG specific ban run lists. You can find a list of variables here: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/pwg/common/bes-ii-run-qa. I would like to ask PWG helpers to provide codes to Ashik on how to calculate those requested variables.@Kaifeng: for the two variables proposed by HF PWG, i.e. bTofYLocal, bTofZLocal, could you discuss with the working group whether they are needed? There was a concern that they are sensitive to vertex position, which is quite wide for BES-II datasets. Do these two variables provide additional information on TOF PID performance besides 1/beta? Do they find new bad runs?Thanks!BestRongrong
-
[STAR-QAboard] QA variables for PWG bad run lists,
Rongrong Ma, 12/10/2021
- Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA variables for PWG bad run lists, Kaifeng Shen, 12/11/2021
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.