star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR QA Board
List archive
- From: Takahito Todoroki <todoroki@bnl.gov>
- To: "star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov" <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA Board Meeting Nov 18
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 01:14:09 +0900
Dear all,
Here is another follow-up: https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/2022_1129_Run19AuAu200QA.pdf
This time I made sure all the scheduler jobs successfully picked up PicoDsts from the distributed disk, and
tighter TPC track quality cuts than the best-II QA default were used. The nHitsDedx >=0 cut cleaned up
tracks with nHitsDedx = 0 that always have phi=0, which changed the run dependences of dE/dx and phi.
Finally, I got the following bad runs:
20191005 refMult
20191015 Dedx
20192001 Dedx
20193001 Phi
20191015 Dedx
20192001 Dedx
20193001 Phi
These bad runs correspond to approximately 10% of the entire statistics.
Best regards,
Takahito
On Nov 21, 2022, at 2:09, Takahito Todoroki <todoroki@bnl.gov> wrote:Dear all,I have revisited some of the points in the minutes. Could you please find the updated slides (https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/2022_1117_Run19AuAu200QA.pdf)and comments inline below.2) Only one bad run found, 20191005 from the QA of refmult. 38 runs in total.After fixing the treatment of the run range edge in the analysis code, this QA has also 39 runs.3) Compare with Rongrong's QA results:Run 20191015 was also marked as bad because it was a very short run according to the run log.
(1). Rongrong found three bad runs: 20191005, 20191015, 20193001.
(2). The difference maybe due to the different number of files that are analyzed.Rescanning the data did not change the status of run 20193001. I will also check if tighter track quality cuts could change the results.Best regards,TakahitoOn Nov 19, 2022, at 2:35, Ting Lin via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov> wrote:Hi all:
A brief minutes for today's meeting:
1. 2019 200GeV Data QA by Takahito Todoroki:
1) Only able to access 81M events (139M in total) from RCF due to the servers' issue. Need to redo the QA once full dataset is available.
2) Only one bad run found, 20191005 from the QA of refmult. 38 runs in total.
3) Compare with Rongrong's QA results:
(1). Rongrong found three bad runs: 20191005, 20191015, 20193001.
(2). The difference maybe due to the different number of files that are analyzed.
2. Currently, QA has been done for all the produced dataset.
We will continue to meet every two weeks.
Best,
Ting-----Original Messages-----_______________________________________________
From: "Ting Lin" <tinglin@sdu.edu.cn>
Sent Time: 2022-11-17 13:20:41 (Thursday)
To: "star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov" <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
Cc:
Subject: QA Board Meeting Nov 18
Hi all:
As discussed last week, we will meet tomorrow on Friday at noon BNL time to see if there is any updates.
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/event/2022/11/18/QA-Board-Meeting
Join ZoomGov Meeting:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bnl.zoomgov.com/j/1618435669?pwd=L3B6M3JKcjRFMVFxQTNhaEdBdkZ5UT09__;!!P4SdNyxKAPE!GErXnnU7jOXLgT_LAyzRzQwXI8CY_h9m_YXmJ2kI5HUjf5Jepz8GMw4dgfJD_o1G3s7OvnDLXJoPVq6VBlCpszya96305g8$
Meeting ID: 161 843 5669
Passcode: 194299
All the previous agendas are listed in the page below:
https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/comp/qa/pwg-qa/run-22-qa
Thanks.
Ting
STAR-QAboard-l mailing list
STAR-QAboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-qaboard-l
-
[STAR-QAboard] QA Board Meeting Nov 18,
Ting Lin, 11/17/2022
-
Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA Board Meeting Nov 18,
Takahito Todoroki, 11/17/2022
- Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA Board Meeting Nov 18, Takahito Todoroki, 11/17/2022
-
Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA Board Meeting Nov 18,
Ting Lin, 11/18/2022
-
Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA Board Meeting Nov 18,
Takahito Todoroki, 11/20/2022
- Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA Board Meeting Nov 18, Takahito Todoroki, 11/28/2022
-
Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA Board Meeting Nov 18,
Takahito Todoroki, 11/20/2022
-
Re: [STAR-QAboard] QA Board Meeting Nov 18,
Takahito Todoroki, 11/17/2022
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.