STAR QA Board

[Xianglei Zhu <xianglei.zhu@icloud.com>]

Hi Zhiwan,

Thanks! As Sooraj mentioned, we are aiming to provide the final embedding 
sample for this dataset. So the list of all runs used in analysis is needed, 
even if some runs cannot be identified as bad runs for now.

Regards,
Xianglei

> On Nov 30, 2023, at 10:13, Sooraj Radhakrishnan <skradhakrishnan@lbl.gov> 
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Zhiwan,
>    Thanks for the slides. It is true that many quantities are more stable 
> towards the later runs, but this is also larger than the range you had 
> provided. For embedding we should have a realistic sampling of data that we 
> use in the analysis so that it accurately captures the detector effects. 
> Stable period is not necessarily the priority. Also, indeed there are more 
> runs after 21027007. So we should try to get the full good run list soon.
> 
> if Xianglei needs only several good runs for his purpose, he can use your 
> list above 
> 
> Best,
> Sooraj
> 
> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 4:29 PM Zhiwan <zhiwanxu@physics.ucla.edu> wrote:
> Hi Sooraj,
>  I checked the different QA variable quality vs runid, and this period is 
> very stable: 
> See slide 8-11 of : 
> https://drupal.star.bnl.gov/STAR/system/files/11.5_GeV_QAboard_Zhiwan_v3.pdf
> 
> The problem Tommy mentioned is that I found there are more run after 
> 21027007 listed in the run log, which was not included in previous QA check 
> years ago. There should be about 80M more data. So I am reanalyzing the bad 
> run list to include those run period.
>  If the embedding data need a stable period, I would recommend from 
>> 21021012 - 21027004
>> Please also exclude one bad run: 21025042 from the period. 
> 
> Kindly let me know if you have any more questions.
> 
> Best,
> Zhiwan
> 
>> On Nov 29, 2023, at 2:09 PM, Sooraj Radhakrishnan 
>> <skradhakrishnan@lbl.gov> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Zhiwan,
>>    Why this run period? We have several more days of data taking for 11.5 
>> GeV. For embedding it is important that we get a realistic sampling over 
>> the whole run period. If the full bad run list is not ready we should try 
>> to get it as soon as possible
>> 
>> Best,
>> Sooraj
>> 
>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 2:34 PM Zhiwan via STAR-QAboard-l 
>> <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>> Dear Xianglei,
>>  For Au+Au 11.5 GeV(run20) please use this run period:
>> 21021012 - 21027004
>> Please also exclude one bad run: 21025042 from the period. 
>> 
>> Kindly let me know if you would need any more information.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Zhiwan
>> 
>> > On Nov 28, 2023, at 6:18 PM, Xianglei Zhu via STAR-QAboard-l 
>> > <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>> > 
>> > Hi Tommy,
>> > 
>> > Thanks for prompt reply. Yes, this is needed urgently, please also 
>> > include all those runs under consideration into this list.
>> > 
>> > Please also provide a list of good runs for 17.3 GeV, this dataset will 
>> > be the next one in the current embedding priority list.
>> > 
>> > Thanks,
>> > Xianglei 
>> > 
>> >> On Nov 29, 2023, at 11:47, Tommy Tsang <tommytsang3108@hotmail.com.hk> 
>> >> wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> Hi Xiangleu,
>> >> 
>> >> Unfortunately a week ago, Zhiwan found a significant bug in her 
>> >> TProfile creation code. We don't have a usable good run list yet.
>> >> 
>> >> Do you need it urgently? If so you can ask Zhiwan for help. She should 
>> >> be able to give you good run list directly from the QA code. That list 
>> >> needs to be discussed before it can be made final, and usually a few 
>> >> more runs will be added after the discussion.  However, depending on 
>> >> your purpose and how urgent you need it, it may be good enough. 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Best wishes,
>> >> Tommy
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> Sent from my Galaxy
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> 
>> >> -------- Original message --------
>> >> From: Xianglei Zhu via STAR-QAboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov> 
>> >> Date: 11/28/23 2:35 PM (GMT-10:00) 
>> >> To: star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov 
>> >> Subject: [STAR-QAboard] good run list for Run20 AuAu11.5 GeV 
>> >> 
>> >> Hi QA board,
>> >> 
>> >> Could you please provide a list of good runs (with TPC) for this 
>> >> dataset? I am preparing the embedding setup for it, this list seems to 
>> >> be essential for restaging the daq/tags file.
>> >> It doesn't need to be a final (official) one by the way.
>> >> 
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Xianglei
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> STAR-QAboard-l mailing list
>> >> STAR-QAboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
>> >> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-qaboard-l
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > STAR-QAboard-l mailing list
>> > STAR-QAboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
>> > https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-qaboard-l
>> _______________________________________________
>> STAR-QAboard-l mailing list
>> STAR-QAboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
>> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-qaboard-l
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Sooraj Radhakrishnan
>> Research Scientist,
>> Department of Physics
>> Kent State University
>> Kent, OH 44243
>> 
>> Physicist Postdoctoral Affiliate
>> Nuclear Science Division
>> Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
>> MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
>> Berkeley, CA 94720
>> Ph: 510-495-2473
>> Email: skradhakrishnan@lbl.gov
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sooraj Radhakrishnan
> Research Scientist,
> Department of Physics
> Kent State University
> Kent, OH 44243
> 
> Physicist Postdoctoral Affiliate
> Nuclear Science Division
> Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
> MS70R0319, One Cyclotron Road
> Berkeley, CA 94720
> Ph: 510-495-2473
> Email: skradhakrishnan@lbl.gov