star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR QA Board
List archive
RE: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li)
- From: "Tsang, Chun Yuen" <ctsang@bnl.gov>
- To: 李东升 <erl@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
- Cc: ASHIK IKBAL <ashikhep@gmail.com>, "star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov" <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: RE: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li)
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 21:30:55 +0000
Hi Dongsheng,
About “masking”, that’s when a sector gives you repeated errors and restarting the runs multiple times didn’t resolve the issue. Instead of rebooting the device, you tell the DAQ to ignore the device so there won’t be data from a particular sector if it’s masked out.
It’s possible that data is still usable despite some sectors being masked out, but if you want to be safe, you should remove those runs.
Best wishes, Tommy
From:
李东升 <erl@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Hi Tommy,
Thanks for your nice study. I never realized that LLM can come into the QA process, so it looks very interesting to me.
I checked the 44 badruns listed in your slide 4. Actually I'm not familiar with the shift log and I don't fully understand what those texts really mean. Just based on my limited understanding, in general I agree most of these 44 badruns look suspicious, but a few of them maybe still look OK to me.
For example, if we look at run 22123007, the shift log says "BTOW: configuration failed -- STOP this run & restart", but they also say "Don't know if this is still what we are supposed to do". Then in run 22123012, they meet this problem again and they say "Was told not to stop the run for this error". So I guess this error message is not related to a major problem?
Another thing is, I find for some of these badruns, along with the error message, they say they mask out something. For instance, I notice run 22162015, 22168015 and 22166026 have this "mask" word. I don't quite understand this terminology, does that mean they hide the problem because it is not serious?
Third thing is, although you mentioned these 44 badruns don't consider ETOF errors, I still find a couple of them related to ETOF, such as 22163028, 22163034, 22163035, 22163036, 22165026 and 22165035(I'm not sure whether they only have ETOF issues). Also I don't know whether ETOF is necessary or not for centrality purpose QA, actually I didn't include ETOF variables in the run-by-run analysis.
Best regards, Dongsheng
|
-
RE: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li),
Tsang, Chun Yuen, 09/10/2024
-
RE: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li),
Tsang, Chun Yuen, 09/25/2024
-
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li),
李东升, 09/25/2024
- Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li), ASHIK IKBAL, 09/25/2024
-
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li),
李东升, 09/25/2024
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li),
Tsang, Chun Yuen, 09/10/2024
-
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li),
ASHIK IKBAL, 09/25/2024
-
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li),
李东升, 09/25/2024
- RE: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li), Tsang, Chun Yuen, 09/25/2024
-
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li),
李东升, 09/25/2024
-
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li),
ASHIK IKBAL, 09/25/2024
-
RE: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Weekly QA Board Meeting - 09/Aug/2024 at noon 12 EDT (Dongsheng Li),
Tsang, Chun Yuen, 09/25/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.