star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov
Subject: STAR QA Board
List archive
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Request for 64-bit Validation Results
- From: "Van Buren, Gene" <gene@bnl.gov>
- To: mkurach <mkurach@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov>
- Cc: ASHIK IKBAL <ashikhep@gmail.com>, star-qaboard-l <star-qaboard-l@lists.bnl.gov>, "STAR Flow, Chirality and Vorticity PWG" <star-fcv-l@lists.bnl.gov>, "star-lfsupc-l@lists.bnl.gov" <star-lfsupc-l@lists.bnl.gov>, "nxu@lbl.gov" <nxu@lbl.gov>, Xin Dong <xdong@lbl.gov>, Nihar Ranjan Sahoo <sahoo.niharr@gmail.com>, Barbara Trzeciak <barbara.trzeciak@gmail.com>, "skradhakrishnan@lbl.gov" <skradhakrishnan@lbl.gov>, 汪轩 <wangxuan2024@mails.ccnu.edu.cn>
- Subject: Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Request for 64-bit Validation Results
- Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2025 03:40:49 +0000
Hi, QA-ers
At this week's QA meeting, a similar list of matching files for the 32-bit
P24iy production of production_19GeV_2019 was requested. Here are the
overlapping set of files, with the same note about locations as I stated for
production_4p59GeV_fixedTarget_2019:
/star/data14/GRID/NFS_FileList/production_19GeV_2019_P24iy_32b_picodst.txt
/star/data14/GRID/NFS_FileList/production_19GeV_2019_P24iy_64b_picodst.txt
Thanks,
-Gene
> On Jun 25, 2025, at 12:29 AM, Van Buren, Gene <gene@bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi, QA-ers
>
> At last week's QA meeting, I volunteered to generate a list of 32-bit
> picoDsts for a one-to-one comparison of the same files produced in 64-bit
> for the production_4p59GeV_fixedTarget_2019 dataset. Here are the two
> lists, but please note that the 64-bit files are on NFS (central) and the
> 32-bit files are on local (xrootd) storage.
>
> /star/data14/GRID/NFS_FileList/production_4p59GeV_fixedTarget_2019_P24iy_SL24c_32b.picodst.txt
> /star/data14/GRID/NFS_FileList/production_4p59GeV_fixedTarget_2019_P24iy_SL24c_64b.picodst.txt
>
> Hope that helps,
> -Gene
>
>> On Jun 18, 2025, at 9:18 AM, mkurach <mkurach@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov> wrote:
>>
>> W dniu 2025-06-17 17:17, ASHIK IKBAL napisał(a):
>>> Dear QA volunteers and all,
>>> We are wondering if you have any results regarding the 64 bit
>>> validation on the small data sets that were produced by Gene. The
>>> locations of those datasets were announced by Gene and also discussed
>>> in the QA board meeting.
>>> This is a priority for us at the moment, as these results are
>>> essential for the production team to proceed to the next phase.
>>> If any of you have already completed or have partial results from this
>>> validation, we would greatly appreciate it if you could share them
>>> here.
>>> To Nu, Xin and Nihar: Could you please forward this email in your pwg
>>> mailing list.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ashik
>>> --
>>> Ashik Ikbal
>>> Research Scientist
>>> Kent State University
>>> (stationed at Brookhaven National Laboratory)
>>> Department Of Physics
>>> Kent, OH 44242, USA
>>> Contact no.s: +1 631-504-7647 (USA)
>>> +91 8250216234 (India)
>>> Alternate e-mails: asheikh2@kent.edu
>>> ashik@rcf.rhic.bnl.gov
>>> ashik.ikbal.sheikh@cern.ch
>> Dear Ashik and all
>> I managed to produce some results for 4.95 Gev dataset using my codes for
>> CF analysis. I can present on the Friday meeting.
>> Best regards
>> Małgorzata Kurach
>
-
[[STAR-QAboard] ] Request for 64-bit Validation Results,
ASHIK IKBAL, 06/17/2025
-
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Request for 64-bit Validation Results,
mkurach, 06/18/2025
-
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Request for 64-bit Validation Results,
Van Buren, Gene, 06/25/2025
- Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Request for 64-bit Validation Results, Van Buren, Gene, 06/27/2025
-
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Request for 64-bit Validation Results,
Van Buren, Gene, 06/25/2025
-
Re: [[STAR-QAboard] ] Request for 64-bit Validation Results,
mkurach, 06/18/2025
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.