STAR task force for evaluating tracking efficiency uncertainty

["Van Buren, Gene" <gene AT bnl.gov>]

Hi, Robert

That’s a reasonable question to ask. In principle, FullField and ReversedFullField should result in identical resolutions. HalfField will be notably worse.

Thanks,

-Gene

On Oct 25, 2022, at 3:42 AM, Robert Líčeník <licenik AT ujf.cas.cz> wrote:



Hi Gene,

thanks for restoring the files. I noticed that each of the data107,108 and 109 directories contains data files with different magnetic field configurations. 

I assume that for the momentum resolution study we are interested mainly in the ReversedFullField, the same as data. Is this correct?

Thanks,

Robert

On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 6:38 PM Van Buren, Gene <gene AT bnl.gov> wrote:

Hi,

An update...

Run 14 MuDst files are now on NFS:
/star/data10[789]/reco/CosmicLocalClock/

Run 11 files are still in the DataCarousel queue and may take a couple few days (they're behind some other requests).

-Gene

> On Oct 20, 2022, at 2:47 PM, Van Buren, Gene <gene AT bnl.gov> wrote:
>
>>
>> I think we can start with Run11 and Run14 cosmic ray data, and decide later on whether we need to produce Run19 cosmic ray.
>
> DataCarousel requests for Runs 11 and 14 are already submitted. Run 11 will appear on DD and accessible via FileCatalog queries. The Run 14 data was not catalogued (special production) and I am restoring them to a few locations on NFS. I'll let you know when they're complete.
>
> Thanks,
> -Gene