star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Star-tpc-l mailing list
List archive
- From: Tonko Ljubicic <tonko AT bnl.gov>
- To: "Van Buren, Gene" <gene AT bnl.gov>
- Cc: Christian Videbæk <christian.videbaek AT gmail.com>, videbaek via Star-tpc-l <Star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Subject: Re: [Star-tpc-l] West side sector 8-3&6
- Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 10:07:38 +0100
Hello,
Christian found and fixed the problem. It was on the DAQ PC side.
-- Tonko
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 6:23 AM Van Buren, Gene via Star-tpc-l
<star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Rough efficiency plots resulting from the loss of those two RDOs are
> attached as phi vs. eta for global tracks from ~1500 Run 19 AuAu200 events.
> First for all global tracks, and then with a 25 hit requirement.
>
> For all globals, we can see that there isn't much impact for eta < 1 (the
> loss of hits doesn't keep the tracks from being found), but there's up to
> ~50% loss for tracks going through that sector at high eta where the tracks
> are shorter to begin with.
>
> For the 25+ hit globals, we can see that the losses extend over a much
> larger range of eta because tracks drop below the cut on number of hits,
> with a larger efficiency drop than I expected. I'll investigate a little
> more and make a blog post.
>
> -Gene
>
> On Mar 13, 2023, at 4:38 PM, Van Buren, Gene via Star-tpc-l
> <star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
>
> Hi, Flemming and all....
>
> On Mar 13, 2023, at 4:29 PM, videbaek via Star-tpc-l
> <Star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov> wrote:
> iii) Gene, what is an estimated loss of efficiency for tracks in sector 8
> with these two RDOs out? We ned some estimate on the loss of physics f this
> is not resolved.
>
>
> ....I seem to remember a similar study being done before, but I don't
> remember where it is nor whether it was pre- iTPC. What I can do relatively
> quickly is take some Run 19 AuAu200 data and process a few hundred events
> with and without those two RDOs and look at the distributions of lost
> tracks. Yuri may actually be more efficiently set up for a such a study
> than me, but I understand he's got plenty else on his plate.
>
> Carrying those inefficiencies through to impact on loss of physics would
> likely require PWG/analyzer involvement.
>
> -Gene
> _______________________________________________
> Star-tpc-l mailing list
> Star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-tpc-l
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Star-tpc-l mailing list
> Star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov
> https://lists.bnl.gov/mailman/listinfo/star-tpc-l
-
[Star-tpc-l] West side sector 8-3&6,
videbaek, 03/13/2023
-
Re: [Star-tpc-l] West side sector 8-3&6,
Van Buren, Gene, 03/13/2023
-
Re: [Star-tpc-l] West side sector 8-3&6,
Van Buren, Gene, 03/14/2023
-
Re: [Star-tpc-l] West side sector 8-3&6,
Tonko Ljubicic, 03/14/2023
- Re: [Star-tpc-l] West side sector 8-3&6, videbaek, 03/14/2023
-
Re: [Star-tpc-l] West side sector 8-3&6,
Tonko Ljubicic, 03/14/2023
-
Re: [Star-tpc-l] West side sector 8-3&6,
Van Buren, Gene, 03/14/2023
-
Re: [Star-tpc-l] West side sector 8-3&6,
Van Buren, Gene, 03/13/2023
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.