star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov
Subject: Star-tpc-l mailing list
List archive
- From: "Fisyak, Yuri V" <fisyak AT bnl.gov>
- To: "zwsweger AT ucdavis.edu" <zwsweger AT ucdavis.edu>, "Star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov" <Star-tpc-l AT lists.bnl.gov>
- Cc: "Van Buren, Gene" <gene AT bnl.gov>, Mathias Labonte <mlabonte AT ucdavis.edu>
- Subject: Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2024 14:26:16 +0000
Hi Zach, thank you for the plots. In TFG the track reconstruction (CA) it is allowed to reconstruct loopers, .i.e. different track segments from track loop are merged. This is the reason why you have no. of reconstructed and possible hits are more than number of pad rows. In TFG version it has been introduced a cut on 15 hits in conversion MuDst => PicoDst
$STAR/StRoot/StMuDSTMaker/COMMON/StMuDst.cxx:111 #else /* __TFG__VERSION__ */ Int_t StMuDst::MinNoTpcMcHits = 15; Int_t StMuDst::MinNoTpcRcHits = 15; … StRoot/StPicoDstMaker/StPicoDstMaker.cxx:1048: if ( !mMuDst->Accept(pTrk) ) continue;
From:
Zachary Sweger <zwsweger AT ucdavis.edu> Hi TPC Experts,
As we discussed this morning, the primary (DCA<3cm) track multiplicity in the test production of 3.2 GeV is lower than in P24ia. Most analyzers require that each track have nHitsFit/nHitsMax>=0.51. After our discussion this morning, I plotted nHitsFit versus nHitsMax (labeled nPossible) and I noticed that many tracks (DCA<3cm) in the test production have very large values of nHitsMax:
The red line shows the nHitsFit/nHitsMax=0.51 cut. Another strange thing in the right plot is the lack of tracks with nHitsFit<15. How can so many tracks have nHitsMax values greater than 72? I also tested for tracks with |eta|>2 for which we expect nHitsMax<~40 and saw many tracks still with surprisingly large nHitsMax values:
Were there any changes to how nHitsMax is calculated in the test production? I'm accessing this variable from the picoDsts via mPicoTrack->nHitsMax();
Thanks! Zach |
-
[[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
Zachary Sweger, 07/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
Fisyak, Yuri V, 07/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
James Dunlop, 07/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
Fisyak, Yuri V, 07/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
James Dunlop, 07/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
Zachary Sweger, 07/19/2024
- Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue, Fisyak, Yuri V, 07/19/2024
- Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue, Fisyak, Yuri V, 07/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
Zachary Sweger, 07/25/2024
- Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue, Fisyak, Yuri V, 07/25/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
Zachary Sweger, 07/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
James Dunlop, 07/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
Fisyak, Yuri V, 07/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
James Dunlop, 07/19/2024
-
Re: [[Star-tpc-l] ] nHitsMax Issue,
Fisyak, Yuri V, 07/19/2024
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.